States High court

POCSO Case: K’taka HC Reduces Life Sentence of Accused Individual

The Karnataka High Court has reduced the sentence of an accused in a POCSO Act case from life imprisonment to 10 years, stressing the importance of providing valid reasons for imposing the highest penalty.

A 27-year-old man from Chikkamagaluru saw his appeal partially accepted by a division bench comprising Justices Sreenivas Harish Kumar and C M Joshi. The court, however, raised his fine from Rs 5,000 to Rs 25,000.

The case involved the defendant befriending and repeatedly sexually assaulting a minor girl in his neighborhood in June 2016. The girl’s mother lodged a complaint in December 2016 upon discovering her daughter’s pregnancy.

A DNA test confirmed the defendant as the biological father. Following an investigation, the police filed an FIR and a charge-sheet.

On June 11, 2018, a special court in Chikkamagaluru district headquarters sentenced the defendant to life imprisonment under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and imposed a Rs 5,000 fine after finding him guilty of criminal intimidation.

The defendant challenged the verdict in the High Court, arguing insufficient proof of the girl’s age through proper documents.

Upon reviewing the case, the division bench observed that oral testimony indicated the girl’s consent, though legally irrelevant due to her actual age of 12 during the incident.

The bench noted this apparent consent conflicted with the imposition of the maximum sentence under Section 6 of the POCSO Act.

It concluded that the special court had not furnished adequate reasons for awarding the maximum life sentence.

As per the law applicable at the time of the offense, Section 6 of the POCSO Act provided for a minimum sentence of 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment and a maximum of life imprisonment.

The court ruled that imposing the maximum sentence necessitated valid reasons, which were absent in the special court’s judgment. Consequently, in its recent order, the court modified the sentence to 10 years’ imprisonment.”

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago