States High court

Punjab and Haryana HC Directs Compensation for Baseless FIR in Drug Case

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has recently issued a directive to the Punjab State police, instructing them to compensate a man with ₹10,000.

The compensation is for the filing of a baseless First Information Report (FIR) against the man in a drug case.

A single bench of Justice Rajbir Sehrawat passed the order while observing that the petitioner, who was arrested had undergone harassment and incurred expenses even though there was no foundation for the complaint filed against him.

“Since the FIR has been got registered even before creating a basis for that, and due to the FIR, the petitioner has been put to the harassment and expenses, therefore, the person, who got the said FIR registered against the petitioner without any basis is directed to pay a compensation of ₹10,000 to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today,” the order reads.

The bench was hearing an anticipatory bail plea filed by Pushpinder Kumar, who had been charged with various offenses under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act).

During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel contended that the charges against Pushpinder Kumar were completely baseless and were filed with malicious intent at the instigation of Sub Inspector (SI) Surinder Kumar.

On the other hand, the State’s counsel countered that the police had received confidential information regarding the petitioner’s involvement in the trading of narcotic drugs and substances. Consequently, the police visited the petitioner’s residence, but they found it locked, and it was acknowledged that nothing incriminating was recovered from the petitioner or the said residence.

Based on the presented facts, the Court concluded, “It can be safely construed that there is no evidence to support the prosecution’s case, even as per the assertions of the police. Therefore, the petitioner deserves protection against arrest.”

The Court did not quash the case but granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in response to his plea.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago