States High court

Rajasthan High Court: Cohabitation Not Bigamy Unless Formalized by Marriage

Living Together ≠ Bigamy: Rajasthan High Court

In a recent ruling, the Rajasthan High Court brought a nuanced perspective to the concept of bigamy, emphasizing that merely cohabitating with another person does not constitute bigamy unless a second marriage is solemnized.

The Case: Accusations of Bigamy

Justice Kuldeep Mathur addressed a case where a married man faced accusations of bigamy for residing with another woman while still married. However, the judge clarified that under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the offence of bigamy only arises if a second marriage occurs while the first is valid.

Legal Clarity: Marriage vs. Cohabitation

The court underscored that living together without formalizing a marriage does not meet the criteria for bigamy. It emphasized the necessity of a legally recognized marriage ceremony for an offence to be established under Section 494 IPC.

Case Details:

The petitioner faced charges of bigamy, cruelty, and other IPC offences based on his wife’s complaint. He challenged these proceedings, asserting that no evidence supported his alleged second marriage.

Court’s Verdict:

The court found no substantiation of a second marriage, dismissing the bigamy accusations. It highlighted the absence of proof regarding the nature of the alleged relationship, be it a legally recognized marriage or a custom like Nata marriage.

Quashing Proceedings:

Consequently, the court quashed the criminal proceedings against the accused, determining that the charge of bigamy was unfounded.

Legal Debate and Contrast

This ruling contrasts with a conflicting view expressed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which suggested liability for bigamy if a person engages in an “adulterous” lifestyle without obtaining a divorce. Additionally, the Delhi High Court emphasized that the absence of adultery laws doesn’t grant immunity for marrying during an existing marriage.

Conclusion:

The Rajasthan High Court’s decision offers clarity on the nuanced aspects of bigamy, highlighting the distinction between cohabitation and formal marriage under the law. It serves as a reminder of the legal intricacies surrounding marital relationships in India.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Payal Singh

Recent Posts

Punjab & Haryana HC Notice To Jindal Law School Over AI-Generated Exam Claims

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…

2 hours ago

ED Files Money Laundering Complaint Against Charanjit Singh Bajaj, 4 Others

The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…

3 hours ago

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

4 hours ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

4 hours ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

5 hours ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

5 hours ago