States High court

Rajasthan High Court: Cohabitation Not Bigamy Unless Formalized by Marriage

Living Together ≠ Bigamy: Rajasthan High Court

In a recent ruling, the Rajasthan High Court brought a nuanced perspective to the concept of bigamy, emphasizing that merely cohabitating with another person does not constitute bigamy unless a second marriage is solemnized.

The Case: Accusations of Bigamy

Justice Kuldeep Mathur addressed a case where a married man faced accusations of bigamy for residing with another woman while still married. However, the judge clarified that under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the offence of bigamy only arises if a second marriage occurs while the first is valid.

Legal Clarity: Marriage vs. Cohabitation

The court underscored that living together without formalizing a marriage does not meet the criteria for bigamy. It emphasized the necessity of a legally recognized marriage ceremony for an offence to be established under Section 494 IPC.

Case Details:

The petitioner faced charges of bigamy, cruelty, and other IPC offences based on his wife’s complaint. He challenged these proceedings, asserting that no evidence supported his alleged second marriage.

Court’s Verdict:

The court found no substantiation of a second marriage, dismissing the bigamy accusations. It highlighted the absence of proof regarding the nature of the alleged relationship, be it a legally recognized marriage or a custom like Nata marriage.

Quashing Proceedings:

Consequently, the court quashed the criminal proceedings against the accused, determining that the charge of bigamy was unfounded.

Legal Debate and Contrast

This ruling contrasts with a conflicting view expressed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which suggested liability for bigamy if a person engages in an “adulterous” lifestyle without obtaining a divorce. Additionally, the Delhi High Court emphasized that the absence of adultery laws doesn’t grant immunity for marrying during an existing marriage.

Conclusion:

The Rajasthan High Court’s decision offers clarity on the nuanced aspects of bigamy, highlighting the distinction between cohabitation and formal marriage under the law. It serves as a reminder of the legal intricacies surrounding marital relationships in India.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Payal Singh

Recent Posts

Supreme Court Says “Marriage Is Relationship Built On Mutual Trust, Companionship”

The Supreme Court has upheld a decision by the Madras High Court granting a divorce…

2 days ago

Delhi HC Grants Anticipatory Bail To Lawyer In Brother’s Criminal Case

The Delhi High Court has granted transit anticipatory bail to a lawyer whose brother is…

2 days ago

Justice Madan B Lokur Appointed As Chairperson of UN Internal Justice Council

Former Supreme Court Justice Madan B Lokur has been recently named the chairperson of the…

2 days ago

Karnataka High Court Directs NLSIU To Implement 0.5% Reservation For Transgender Persons

The Karnataka High Court has recently directed the National Law School of India University (NLSIU)…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Directs UP Vigilance To Investigate Himalayan Cooperative Housing Land Issue

The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Vigilance Department to investigate the Himalayan…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Grants Stay On Mohammed Zubair’s Arrest In Religious Enmity Case

The Allahabad High Court on Friday issued an order staying the arrest of Mohammed Zubair,…

2 days ago