States High court

Rajasthan High Court: Cohabitation Not Bigamy Unless Formalized by Marriage

Living Together ≠ Bigamy: Rajasthan High Court

In a recent ruling, the Rajasthan High Court brought a nuanced perspective to the concept of bigamy, emphasizing that merely cohabitating with another person does not constitute bigamy unless a second marriage is solemnized.

The Case: Accusations of Bigamy

Justice Kuldeep Mathur addressed a case where a married man faced accusations of bigamy for residing with another woman while still married. However, the judge clarified that under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the offence of bigamy only arises if a second marriage occurs while the first is valid.

Legal Clarity: Marriage vs. Cohabitation

The court underscored that living together without formalizing a marriage does not meet the criteria for bigamy. It emphasized the necessity of a legally recognized marriage ceremony for an offence to be established under Section 494 IPC.

Case Details:

The petitioner faced charges of bigamy, cruelty, and other IPC offences based on his wife’s complaint. He challenged these proceedings, asserting that no evidence supported his alleged second marriage.

Court’s Verdict:

The court found no substantiation of a second marriage, dismissing the bigamy accusations. It highlighted the absence of proof regarding the nature of the alleged relationship, be it a legally recognized marriage or a custom like Nata marriage.

Quashing Proceedings:

Consequently, the court quashed the criminal proceedings against the accused, determining that the charge of bigamy was unfounded.

Legal Debate and Contrast

This ruling contrasts with a conflicting view expressed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which suggested liability for bigamy if a person engages in an “adulterous” lifestyle without obtaining a divorce. Additionally, the Delhi High Court emphasized that the absence of adultery laws doesn’t grant immunity for marrying during an existing marriage.

Conclusion:

The Rajasthan High Court’s decision offers clarity on the nuanced aspects of bigamy, highlighting the distinction between cohabitation and formal marriage under the law. It serves as a reminder of the legal intricacies surrounding marital relationships in India.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Payal Singh

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

4 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

4 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

5 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

5 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

6 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

6 hours ago