The Madras High Court in P Naveen Kumar v. The District Collector, Karur & Others, made a groundbreaking ruling, affirming that the right to privacy encompasses not just sexual and gender orientation but also an individual’s spiritual inclination. This verdict, delivered by Justice GR Swaminathan, sets a significant precedent in recognizing the holistic aspect of privacy rights.
Recognizing Spiritual Privacy
In a notable case, the Madras High Court acknowledged the right to spiritual privacy as part of an individual’s broader right to privacy. Justice GR Swaminathan emphasized that just as sexual and gender orientation are protected under privacy rights, so too is one’s spiritual orientation.
Upholding Religious Rituals
The court’s decision came in response to a petition filed by a local resident seeking permission to perform a traditional vow known as Angapradakshinam at a temple in Karur district. Despite opposition from state and district authorities, Justice Swaminathan upheld the petitioner’s right to practice this ritual, highlighting its significance in Tamil religious culture.
Broadening the Scope of Freedom of Movement
Furthermore, the court asserted that the practice of Angapradakshinam falls under the constitutional right to freedom of movement guaranteed by Article 19(1)(d) of the Indian Constitution. By recognizing this ritual as a form of movement integral to religious expression, the court expanded the understanding of this fundamental right.
In a broader context, this ruling reaffirms the multidimensional nature of privacy rights and underscores the importance of respecting individuals’ spiritual beliefs and practices within the framework of constitutional freedoms.
Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International
