States High court

‘Social Media Info Cannot be Part of PIL Pleadings’: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court stated on Tuesday that information gathered from social media cannot be included in the pleadings of a public interest litigation (PIL).

The remarks were made during the hearing of a petition asserting that 1,500 to 2,000 individuals lose their lives annually in unsafe water bodies in Maharashtra.

A division bench of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Arif Doctor declined to hear a PIL filed by advocate Ajitsingh Ghorpade, seeking a directive for the Maharashtra government to take measures to safeguard waterfalls and water bodies in the state.

Ghorpade’s lawyer, Manindra Pandey, claimed that approximately 1,500 to 2,000 people lose their lives at such unsafe waterfalls and water bodies each year. The court inquired about the source of the information on the deaths, and Pandey mentioned newspapers and social media posts.

The court responded that the petition lacked details and deemed it vague.

Chief Justice Upadhyaya remarked that information obtained from social media cannot be part of the pleadings in a PIL, emphasizing the responsibility in filing such petitions and avoiding wastage of judicial time.

The court asserted that petitions of this nature could not be entertained, considering them a “sheer wastage” of time. The bench questioned the relevance of a PIL in cases where accidents occurred during picnics or drownings due to accidents, stating that such incidents did not violate fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 (equality and life).

Pandey suggested that the state government should be directed to take steps for the safety and protection of people visiting water bodies and waterfalls. The bench, however, noted that many accidents were a result of “reckless acts” and questioned the practicality of having police man every waterfall and water body.

The court asked the petitioner to withdraw the PIL and encouraged the filing of a revised petition with proper details. The petitioner agreed and withdrew the petition.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Supreme Court Says “Marriage Is Relationship Built On Mutual Trust, Companionship”

The Supreme Court has upheld a decision by the Madras High Court granting a divorce…

2 days ago

Delhi HC Grants Anticipatory Bail To Lawyer In Brother’s Criminal Case

The Delhi High Court has granted transit anticipatory bail to a lawyer whose brother is…

2 days ago

Justice Madan B Lokur Appointed As Chairperson of UN Internal Justice Council

Former Supreme Court Justice Madan B Lokur has been recently named the chairperson of the…

2 days ago

Karnataka High Court Directs NLSIU To Implement 0.5% Reservation For Transgender Persons

The Karnataka High Court has recently directed the National Law School of India University (NLSIU)…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Directs UP Vigilance To Investigate Himalayan Cooperative Housing Land Issue

The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Vigilance Department to investigate the Himalayan…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Grants Stay On Mohammed Zubair’s Arrest In Religious Enmity Case

The Allahabad High Court on Friday issued an order staying the arrest of Mohammed Zubair,…

2 days ago