States High court

‘Will Appoint State Consumer Commission’s President within Six Weeks’: Telangana Govt to HC

The Telangana government has provided an assurance to the Telangana High Court that the vacant post of President of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission will be filled within six weeks.

Senior Counsel Harender Pershad, representing the State, made this undertaking before the division bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice T Vinod Kumar during the hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Advocate Beglekar Akash Kumar, challenging the State’s inaction in filling the post of President in the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

Senior Counsel Pershad, a Special Government Pleader in the case, informed the bench that a notification had been issued, and three names were referred by the selection committee. Responding to the court’s query on the timeline for the appointment, Chief Justice Aradhe asked for a timeframe. The senior counsel requested four weeks, but the court granted six weeks for the appointment. The State gave an undertaking that the post would be filled before the next date of hearing, which is September 6, 2023.

In the plea, Advocate Beglekar Akash Kumar, the petitioner, stated that the post of the President of the State Consumer Commission had remained vacant since the retirement of Justice MSK Jaiswal in February. The petitioner pointed out that though a notification was issued in December 2022 to fill the post, it remained unfilled.

Kumar argued that the State Consumer Commission deals with appeals and revisions from twelve districts across the State, and it also serves as the Court of Original Jurisdiction for claims with pecuniary value between fifty lakhs and two crores. He highlighted that a significant number of cases are filed in the Telangana State Consumer Commission each year.

The petitioner further mentioned that he had made representations to the Chief Minister of Telangana State and the Telangana State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, but his representations had not been considered. Consequently, the PIL was filed to address the matter.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

16 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

16 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

16 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

17 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

17 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

17 hours ago