International

Brazil’s Supreme Court Orders Suspension of Elon Musk’s X

On August 30, 2024, Justice Alexandre de Moraes of Brazil’s Federal Supreme Court (Supremo Tribunal Federal or STF) ordered the immediate and complete suspension of X, formerly Twitter, throughout the country.

Earlier, on August 29, Moraes had instructed Elon Musk to appoint a legal representative for X in Brazil within 24 hours, warning that failure to do so would result in a nationwide suspension. The STF announced, “STF summons Elon Musk and X to appoint a legal representative within 24 hours, under penalty of suspension of activities in Brazil.”

The STF had warned that non-compliance would lead to the suspension of the social network’s operations in Brazil.

“In case of non-compliance with the determination, the decision provides for the suspension of the social network’s activities in Brazil.” the judge stated.

The suspension will remain in effect until the court’s judicial decisions are complied with and the fines are paid. The order will also be valid until the company appoints a representative in the country, according to the court’s decision.

The decision, made in Petition (PET) 12404, requires Carlos Manuel Baigorri, the president of the National Telecommunications Agency (Anatel), to take all necessary measures to enforce the suspension. Additionally, the rapporteur ordered Apple and Google to block the application from iOS and Android systems and to remove it from their app stores.

As per Moraes, the STF made every effort and provided ample opportunity for X Brasil to comply with court orders and settle fines to avoid this severe measure. “Unfortunately, the illicit conduct was repeated in the current investigation, demonstrating X Brasil’s failure to comply with multiple court orders and its intentional evasion of responsibility, including the disappearance of its legal representatives in Brazil,” Moraes stated.

The decision also imposes a daily fine of BRL 50,000 on individuals and companies that use “technological subterfuges” to continue using X, in addition to other sanctions in the civil and criminal spheres.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Nunnem Gangte

Share
Published by
Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

6 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

6 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

6 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

7 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

7 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

7 hours ago