International

Disenfranchisement Case: Imran Khan’s Party Calls For Full Court Hearing

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf on Sunday has requested the Supreme Court to expedite its review petition challenging the decision to deny the party its ‘bat’ symbol for upcoming general elections.

In its application, PTI pointed out that the scope of the current review petition overlaps with the ongoing case regarding reserved seats, which is being deliberated by the full bench of the Supreme Court. The core question revolves around whether the removal of PTI’s ‘bat’ symbol by the Election Commission of Pakistan resulted in the party being denied reserved seats, or if the ECP misinterpreted the Supreme Court’s earlier directive.

PTI emphasized that unless both issues are heard together by a larger bench, the matter of reserved seats and PTI’s entitlement to them will remain unresolved, potentially causing irreparable harm to the party.

The party’s plea for an early hearing by a larger bench was accepted, and a panel of 5 judges reviewed the applications. PTI argued that the implementation of the Supreme Court’s January 13 judgment, upholding the ECP’s decision to strip PTI of its symbol, has severely disadvantaged both the party and the public, who were deprived of their right to elect PTI candidates under a unified symbol.

Highlighting constitutional violations and the urgency of the situation, PTI stressed that delaying the resolution of the case could have detrimental consequences.

On Sunday, Justice Athar Minallah of the Pakistan Supreme Court directed the Election Commission of Pakistan to justify to the court why PTI was legitimately excluded from the electoral process, leading to the forfeiture of its claim to reserved seats.

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare
AddThis Website Tools
Meera Verma

Recent Posts

SC Upholds Disqualification Of Himachal Pradesh Pradhan For Concealing Criminal Case

The Supreme Court has upheld the Himachal Pradesh High Court's decision that candidates contesting panchayat…

2 hours ago

Delhi Court To Hear Satyender Jain’s Defamation Case; Confirms Jurisdiction

The Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court on Saturday has ruled that it has jurisdiction to proceed…

2 hours ago

Copyright Case: Delhi HC Directs A R Rahman, Ponniyin Selvan 2 Makers To Deposit Rs 2 cr

The Delhi High Court has determined that “Veera Raja Veera,” featured in the film Ponniyin…

2 hours ago

Road Rage Case: Karnataka HC Obstructs IAF Officer From Police Action

The Karnataka High Court has barred Bengaluru police from arresting Indian Air Force (IAF) Wing…

3 hours ago

Defamation Case: Pune Court Summons Rahul Gandhi Over His Remarks On Savarkar

A Pune court has called Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to appear on May 9 in…

3 hours ago

Madras HC Restores 2 Disproportionate Assets Cases Against Minister Panneerselvam

The Madras High Court has revived two disproportionate assets (DA) cases against DMK leader and…

4 hours ago