International

Hush-Money Case: Trump’s Legal Team Seeks Federal Court For Hearing in NY

Donald Trump’s legal team will request a transfer from state court to a U.S. federal judge regarding a criminal case accusing the former president of falsifying business records in connection with a hush money payment to a porn star.

Trump argues that the case should be heard in federal court, citing its relevance to the presidency, involvement of federal election law, and his claim of immunity from state prosecution.

As the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, Trump pleaded not guilty in April in Manhattan to 34 state charges of falsifying business records, which were related to concealing reimbursements to his former lawyer Michael Cohen for the $130,000 payment made to silence porn star Stormy Daniels prior to the 2016 election.

Stephanie Clifford (known as Stormy Daniels) claims to have had a sexual encounter with Trump.

U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein ruled that Trump’s presence was not necessary for the hearing.

One key aspect in determining jurisdiction is whether the charges are linked to Trump’s presidency. Trump’s lawyers argue that his hiring of Michael Cohen, his former lawyer, was based on his role as president, suggesting a sufficient association.

Furthermore, they contend that the charges involve reimbursing Cohen for a payment intended to influence the presidential election. They claim that federal law supersedes state law in federal election matters and assert that Trump is immune from state prosecution due to the payment occurring in 2017, during his presidency.

The Manhattan District Attorney’s office, which initiated the case, asserts that the conduct in question has no relevance to Trump’s presidential duties.

Prosecutors argue that there is no connection to any official act and state that federal election law does not override state regulations on fraud. They also challenge Trump’s claim of immunity, stating that his actions did not involve official duties.

If the case remains in state court, it is scheduled for trial in March, adding further complexity to the legal proceedings.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Supreme Court Says “Marriage Is Relationship Built On Mutual Trust, Companionship”

The Supreme Court has upheld a decision by the Madras High Court granting a divorce…

2 days ago

Delhi HC Grants Anticipatory Bail To Lawyer In Brother’s Criminal Case

The Delhi High Court has granted transit anticipatory bail to a lawyer whose brother is…

2 days ago

Justice Madan B Lokur Appointed As Chairperson of UN Internal Justice Council

Former Supreme Court Justice Madan B Lokur has been recently named the chairperson of the…

2 days ago

Karnataka High Court Directs NLSIU To Implement 0.5% Reservation For Transgender Persons

The Karnataka High Court has recently directed the National Law School of India University (NLSIU)…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Directs UP Vigilance To Investigate Himalayan Cooperative Housing Land Issue

The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Vigilance Department to investigate the Himalayan…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Grants Stay On Mohammed Zubair’s Arrest In Religious Enmity Case

The Allahabad High Court on Friday issued an order staying the arrest of Mohammed Zubair,…

2 days ago