International

Hush-Money Case: Trump’s Legal Team Seeks Federal Court For Hearing in NY

Donald Trump’s legal team will request a transfer from state court to a U.S. federal judge regarding a criminal case accusing the former president of falsifying business records in connection with a hush money payment to a porn star.

Trump argues that the case should be heard in federal court, citing its relevance to the presidency, involvement of federal election law, and his claim of immunity from state prosecution.

As the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, Trump pleaded not guilty in April in Manhattan to 34 state charges of falsifying business records, which were related to concealing reimbursements to his former lawyer Michael Cohen for the $130,000 payment made to silence porn star Stormy Daniels prior to the 2016 election.

Stephanie Clifford (known as Stormy Daniels) claims to have had a sexual encounter with Trump.

U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein ruled that Trump’s presence was not necessary for the hearing.

One key aspect in determining jurisdiction is whether the charges are linked to Trump’s presidency. Trump’s lawyers argue that his hiring of Michael Cohen, his former lawyer, was based on his role as president, suggesting a sufficient association.

Furthermore, they contend that the charges involve reimbursing Cohen for a payment intended to influence the presidential election. They claim that federal law supersedes state law in federal election matters and assert that Trump is immune from state prosecution due to the payment occurring in 2017, during his presidency.

The Manhattan District Attorney’s office, which initiated the case, asserts that the conduct in question has no relevance to Trump’s presidential duties.

Prosecutors argue that there is no connection to any official act and state that federal election law does not override state regulations on fraud. They also challenge Trump’s claim of immunity, stating that his actions did not involve official duties.

If the case remains in state court, it is scheduled for trial in March, adding further complexity to the legal proceedings.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

4 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

4 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

5 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

5 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

6 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

6 hours ago