International

Lahore HC Dismisses Plea against Ex-PM Nawaz Sharif’s Nomination Papers

The Lahore High Court (LHC) has dismissed a petition against the rejection of an appeal against approval of former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s nomination papers from NA-130, according to reports.

A three-member bench headed by Justice Ali Bagar Najafi heard the petition filed by Pakistan Awami Mahaz Chief, Advocate Ishtiaq Chaudhary, against the Appellate Tribunal’s decision.

Chaudhary had challenged the acceptance of Nawaz Sharif’s nomination papers on grounds of his lifetime disqualification from the Supreme Court in the Panama case.

Nevertheless, the court observed that the Supreme Court has already given its verdict over the eligibility.

As per the petition, the tribunal dismissed the appeal against Nawaz Sharif’s nomination papers in contravention of the facts of the case. “Nawaz Sharif has been disqualified for life and could not contest the election,” the petitioner argued.

The petitioner pleaded with the court to reject Sharif’s nomination papers.

“The Supreme Court’s decision against disqualification for life was given after approval of Nawaz Sharif’s nomination papers and this decision could not apply to Nawaz Sharif’s case,” the petitioner said.

The Pakistan Supreme Court recently ended the lifetime disqualification of lawmakers, recalling its earlier order disbarring politicians from running for office ever. The decision has come as a major boost for several big names who are aiming to contest the general elections on February 8.

The Supreme Court declared that no person can be barred for a lifetime from running in elections if they are disqualified under Article 62 (1)(f), setting aside its landmark judgement in the Samiullah Baloch case.

Reports indicated that the latest judgement allows PML-N supremo Nawaz Sharif and Istehkam-e-Pakistan Party (IPP) chief Jahangir Tareen to run for office as they were disqualified for life.

A seven-member larger bench — headed by CJP Qazi Faez Isa and comprising Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Aminuddin Khan, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, and Justice Musarrat Hilali — conducted the hearings of the case, which were broadcast live on the apex court’s website.

Backing the previous judgements of the apex court, the bench announced the verdict with a 6-1 majority as Justice Yahya Afridi disagreed with his fellow judges.

Nunnem Gangte

Share
Published by
Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago