International

Pak Court Adjourns Hearing Of Nawaz Sharif’s Petition To Revive Appeals In 2 Corruption Cases Till Nov 27

Pakistan’s Islamabad court on Tuesday adjourned the hearing of former prime minister Nawaz Sharif’s petitions till November 27 to revive appeals against his conviction in the Avenfield and Al-Azizia corruption cases as he prepares to lead his party in the general elections.

A 2-member bench of the Islamabad High Court comprising Chief Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, took up the appeals for hearing and heard Sharif’s counsel Azam Tarar and the legal team of the National Accountability Bureau.

Therefore, the bench adjourned the hearing until Monday and asked Tarar to present his arguments at the next hearing.

The 73-year-old 3-time prime minister returned to Pakistan on October 21 after about 4 years of self-imposed exile in London and was present in the court at the time of hearing. He is expected to lead the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz party in the general elections set to be held on February 8 next year.

Sharif arrived in court amid tight security. He was accompanied by his brother, ex-premier Shehbaz Sharif, and an entourage comprising senior PML-N leaders.

The PML-N supremo was convicted and sentenced to 10 years in jail by an accountability court in the Avenfiled case in July 2018 for owning the illegal properties in London.

His daughter, Maryam Nawaz, was also sentenced to 7 years in jail in the case but was acquitted in September 2022 along with her husband, Muhammad Safdar.

The former premier was also convicted in the Al-Azizia Steel Mills corruption case and sentenced to 7 years in jail in December 2018.

He challenged the sentence, but the appeal process was halted as he was away in London.

Furthermore, he was allowed to go to London in November 2019 on medical grounds, and returned about 4 years later in October.

The IHC declared him a proclaimed offender in both cases in December 2020.

The former premier returned last month from London after about 4 years and approached the IHC to restore his appeals, which was duly done.

Meera Verma

Share
Published by
Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago