International

Pak Election Commission Challenges Lahore HC Order In SC To Prevent Delay In Polls

Pakistan’s poll body has recently approached the Supreme Court against a verdict of Lahore High Court on the appointment of bureaucrats as Returning Officers, a ruling that led to uncertainty over the much-awaited February 8 general elections.

The development has aimed at preventing a potential delay in the upcoming general elections, came even as at least three main political parties announced to become parties in the case being heard by the Lahore High Court.

The Secretary of the Election Commission of Pakistan approached the Supreme Court to challenge the LHC ruling and late on Friday evening, a 3-judge bench, led by Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa, heard the petition.

It stated that the development followed a meeting between Chief Election Commissioner Sikandar Sultan Raja and CJP Isa, also attended by Justice Sardar Tariq, Justice Ijazul Ahsan, and the Attorney General for Pakistan that discussed the situation following the LHC verdict.

The LHC on Wednesday suspended the decision of the ECP to appoint bureaucrats as Returning Officers and district returning officers for the February 8 elections prompting the poll body to pause a training session for ROs and DROs on Thursday.

The LHC reserved the verdict on Wednesday while hearing a plea by jailed former prime minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party. While alleging that Khan’s party is trying to delay the polls, Pakistan People’s Party, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, and Balochistan Awami Party decided to jump in the fray.

It added, “The high court order seemingly brought the electoral process to a standstill, causing widespread concern among political parties including the petitioner PTI regarding general elections.”

LHC’s Justice Ali Baqar Najafi stated that on factual grounds, “the apparent absence of a level playing field” for the political party of the petitioner (PTI) is visible to all and has also been seriously noted by many independent groups.

PML-N Central Information Secretary Marriyum Aurangzeb posted on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), “The PML-N will be a party against the LHC’s decision regarding ROs. The party’s legal team had begun preparing a petition in this regard.” The PPP also announced that it would file a plea in the LHC seeking to become a party in the case while BAP’s Khalid Magsi, in a statement, stated that he directed his party to prepare a petition seeking to become a party in the case.

Leaders from both PPP and PML-N blamed Khan and his PTI for delaying the polls.

“The PTI has once again tried to derail the electoral process,” sources quoted the PPP leader, who also claimed, “This reflects their undemocratic and apolitical mindset. It is clear that the PTI doesn’t want elections to be held in the country.”

PML-N leader Ahsan Iqbal was quoted as accusing the PTI of “conspiring to sabotage elections” in the country and stating, “This proves that they can see their future, they can see defeat in polls and to save themselves from this defeat, they are trying to delay the elections.” Meanwhile, an ECP official told sources that the announcement of the election schedule depended on the final verdict in the case related to the appointment of DROs & ROs.

He stated, “The ROs are the ones who issue public notices inviting nominations and also receive and scrutinise nomination papers. An election schedule cannot be issued in the absence of ROs, they are the ones to implement the schedule.”

The unnamed ECP official also drew attention to another hurdle, which Dawn said, was “the delimitation cases being remanded to the election watchdog by the high courts for reconsideration.” The official stated, that the judiciary, not the ECP, would be responsible in case elections were delayed.

Meera Verma

Share
Published by
Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago