A petition has been recently filed in the Supreme Court of Pakistan seeking removal of Pakistan President Arif Alvi for allegedly not acting in accordance with the responsibilities of the highest office and being biased.
The petition filed by Ghulam Murtaza Khan in person alleged that the Pakistan President has been evasive in performing his constitutional obligations.
The petitioner stated, “He has violated the Constitution and committed gross misconduct, therefore, he is not eligible to continue his duties as the president and needs to be declared that he should not continue as president of Pakistan.”
He alleged, “Being the head of the State, he is under constitutional obligation to work in accordance with law but he was misusing the powers and violating the Constitution continuously by his words and conducts.”
Khan stressed that the President represents the entire nation throughout the world. The petitioner alleged that he should fulfil this responsibility patriotically with loyalty & devotion. The petitioner stated that the petitioner should not have been representing any political party. However, he alleged that the President is representing and portraying one party – the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf.
The petitioner also cited the example of the April 2022 dissolution of the National Assembly on the instructions given by former Pakistan PM Imran Khan, which as per the petitioner ruined the entire political scenario of Pakistan.
He alleged that despite that the President dissolved the assembly, even though the top Court set aside the same by overturning the ruling of the deputy speaker to dismiss the then no-trust resolution against Imran Khan and the subsequent dissolution of the assembly by the president.
The petitioner called it the responsibility of the President to ensure peace within the country and stressed that when the president is representing the entire country, he can’t act in a biased/subjective manner by favouring a particular political party.
Furthermore, he alleged that Arif Alvi misused his powers by using his office to allegedly support PTI. The petitioner stated that the President’s office had allegedly being used for the meetings or activities of the party and added that this act of the president was also unconstitutional and biased towards the whole nation.
He stressed Pakistan’s President represents the whole nation as head of the state and his interests and actions should be very clear towards the welfare, prestige, betterment, development, peace & prosperity of the country.
The petitioner also mentioned the President’s act of not assenting the Official Secrets Amendment Bill and the Pakistan Army Amendment Bill, which he thought was grave misconduct and demonstrated a partial stance.
The petitioner stated that the President on various occasions contradicts his position by making controversial statements and added that these actions have made the character of the president very distrustful for the whole nation as he violated the provisions of Articles 5 & 12 of the Constitution.
The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…
The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…
The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…
The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…
The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…
The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…