Federal prosecutors have expanded their criminal case against music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs, adding two more charges to the existing indictment.
The updated filing now accuses the 55-year-old of using force, fraud, or coercion to compel a woman, identified in court documents as Victim-2, into engaging in commercial sex acts between 2021 and 2024.
Charges Expanded
The superseding indictment, filed Friday, marks a significant escalation in the case. It alleges that Combs was involved not only in coercing Victim-2 but also in transporting her and other individuals, including commercial sex workers, for illicit activities over a three-year period.
With these additions, the total number of charges against Combs has increased from three to five. The original charges, filed in September, included racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking.
Awaiting Trial In Federal Custody
Combs remains in custody at a Brooklyn federal detention center. He has pleaded not guilty to the earlier charges, and his legal team continues to deny all allegations. His trial is scheduled to begin on May 5. A request for comment on the new charges has been sent to his representatives.
The prosecution alleges that Combs orchestrated a criminal enterprise, using his wealth, influence, and network of associates to coerce women into sex acts, silence victims, and maintain control through threats, violence, and manipulation.
What Prosecutors Claim?
Prosecutors claim Combs forced women to participate in sexually explicit performances with male escorts at events referred to as “Freak Offs.” One key piece of evidence is a 2016 video, allegedly showing Combs assaulting singer Cassie, his former girlfriend, in a Los Angeles hotel hallway. Prosecutors say the incident occurred during one such event.
However, Combs’ lawyers argue that the footage offers only “a glimpse into a complex but decade-long consensual relationship.”
Defense Dismisses Allegations As Consensual
Combs’ legal team has pushed back forcefully. In a February court filing, attorney Alexandra A.E. Shapiro argued that the case is built on misleading narratives. She stated that the government’s claims center around “a consensual sexual relationship,” not criminal conduct.
This is the second superseding indictment in the case, following a January update which alleged that at least three women were pressured into sex in exchange for money, housing, or career help.
Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International
