International

UK Court Rejects Nirav Modi’s Bail Application, Citing Risk of ‘Evading Justice’

Nirav Modi, the fugitive businessman who has been imprisoned in London for more than five years, filed a fresh bail application which a UK judge rejected, ruling that he still presented a “substantial risk” of evading justice.

The 52-year-old diamond merchant, who lost his extradition battle to face charges of fraud and money laundering in India, did not appear for the bail hearing at Westminster Magistrates Court in London. However, his son and two daughters were present in the gallery.

Bail Rejected

District Judge John Zani accepted the argument from their legal team that the significant passage of time since the last bail application three and a half years ago constituted a change in circumstances permitting the hearing to proceed.

“However, I am satisfied that there remain substantial grounds against bail. There continues to be a real, substantial risk that the applicant [Nirav Modi] would fail to attend court or interfere with witnesses,” Judge Zani concluded in his judgment after a brief hearing. “This case involves, by any footing, a very substantial fraud allegation… not one where bail can be granted and the application is refused,” he added.

The court was informed that although Modi had lost his legal battle against extradition, there were “confidential” proceedings underway initiated by him.

While this could indicate an asylum application, the only indirect mention in court was when the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), representing the Indian authorities, refuted the claim that the UK Home Secretary might “never be able to order extradition” as inaccurate.

“He has shown his complete determination to avoid facing the allegations in an Indian court, and it is no exaggeration to say the fraud in question exceeds USD 1 billion, of which only USD 400 million has been seized. Therefore, he could still have access to significant resources in various jurisdictions,” CPS barrister Nicholas Hearn told the court.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Nunnem Gangte

Share
Published by
Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago