International

United States: Pentagon Appeals Court Upholds Plea Deals Of 9/11 Plotters

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The U.S. government may proceed with the controversial plea agreements involving three men accused of masterminding the 9/11 attacks following a ruling by a Department of Defense appeals court.

The unanimous decision, handed down on Monday night, criticized Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, who had attempted to block the deals in August, despite them being approved by a judge overseeing the cases.

The plea agreements concern Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged architect of the 9/11 attacks, and his two accomplices, Walid bin Attash and Mustafa al-Hawsawi. In exchange for admitting their involvement in the al-Qaeda plot that killed 2,977 people, the men would serve life sentences. The hijackers crashed 2 planes into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, another into the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, and the fourth plane, intended for a government building in Washington, D.C., was brought down in a field.

Austin had contended that the families of the victims and others impacted by the resulting wars deserved to see the men stand trial. However, the appeals court ruled that while Austin could restrict future pretrial agreements, he did not have the authority to invalidate those that had already been approved. The court emphasized that the defendants’ confessions would prevent any future trial proceedings.

A senior defense official, speaking anonymously, confirmed that both the Defense and Justice Departments are reviewing the ruling and weighing their options. On Tuesday, the U.S. government filed a motion to delay the plea agreements until January 27 to give officials more time to decide on potential legal actions. A motions hearing for Mohammed’s case is set for January 6.

The appeals court’s decision upholds an earlier ruling by Air Force Col. Matthew McCall, a military commission judge, who had determined in November that the plea deals were valid. McCall stated that allowing Austin to reverse the agreements would effectively grant him an “absolute veto” over any discretionary actions made by the officer overseeing the cases. The Pentagon had appealed McCall’s ruling, leading to the appeals court’s involvement.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, one of the most high-profile figures in terrorism, was captured in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, in March 2003, and has been detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, since then.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Terror Funding Case: Delhi Court Junks Engineer Rashid’s Bail Plea

A Delhi court on Friday rejected the bail application of Lok Sabha MP from Jammu…

1 hour ago

Bombay High Court Quashes Sexual Harassment Findings Against Bank Employee

The Bombay High Court has overturned an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) report and a subsequent…

2 hours ago

Honey-Trap Scandal: Opposition BJP Members Stage Dharna In K’taka Legislative Assembly Seeking Judicial Probe

The members of the opposition BJP on Friday staged a protest in the Karnataka Legislative…

2 hours ago

Parliament Erupts Over Cash Found At Delhi HC Judge’s Residence; Calls For Judicial Accountability Intensify

The issue relating to the alleged recovery of large pile of unaccounted cash from the…

3 hours ago

Petition Filed Against Nitish Kumar In Bihar Court For Disrespecting National Anthem

A heated war of words broke out in the Bihar Assembly on Friday as ruling…

3 hours ago

Barrister Saif Accuses Sharif Family Of Financial Misconduct

Barrister Saif, the Information Adviser for Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (K-P), has accused the Sharif family of…

4 hours ago