International

US Court Extends Deadline For Federal Workers To Accept Trump’s Resignation Offer

A US federal judge has temporarily delayed the deadline for federal employees to decide on the Trump administration’s deferred resignation offer, which was originally set for February 6.

The deadline has now been extended to Monday, following a lawsuit filed by several federal unions, including the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME).

The court-ordered delay was communicated to federal employees via email just after 5 PM ET. However, the email did not mention the possibility of further delays, which could be considered during a Monday afternoon hearing.

Legal Challenge Against the “Fork Directive”

Before the judge’s intervention, eligible federal employees had until 11:59 PM ET on Thursday to accept the offer, allowing them to resign while still receiving pay through September. However, the AFGE, AFSCME, and the National Association of Government Employees filed a lawsuit in the US District Court in Massachusetts on Tuesday, seeking a temporary restraining order to block the “Fork Directive” deadline.

The unions argued that the directive was an unlawful and arbitrary ultimatum, pressuring workers into a decision they might later be unable to enforce. They demanded that the government establish a clear and lawful policy rather than imposing a rushed, legally questionable mandate.

According to AFGE, the “Fork Directive” is part of the Trump-Vance administration’s broader Project 2025 agenda, which aims to replace career public service employees with partisan loyalists. The directive, they claim, forces federal workers to resign now or risk termination without compensation in the near future.

Judge Orders Temporary Halt

US District Judge George O’Toole, appointed by President Bill Clinton, issued the ruling after a brief hearing, stating he would pause implementation of the plan while reviewing further details on whether it should be permanently blocked.

Federal unions have strongly advised employees not to accept the offer, citing concerns over its legality and the administration’s ability to uphold its promises.

Despite the legal uncertainty, at least 65,000 federal workers have already opted into the deferred resignation program, a White House official confirmed on Thursday.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtInternational

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago