International

US SC Upholds Google’s Triumph In Genius Lawsuit On Song Lyrics

The U.S. Supreme Court has recently rejected an appeal by the website Genius to revive its lawsuit against Google, alleging that Google improperly used its song lyric transcripts in search results without permission.

The court’s decision upholds a previous ruling that dismissed Genius’ breach-of-contract claims against Google. Genius had argued that a favorable outcome for Google could set a precedent for other tech companies to unlawfully appropriate content from websites like Reddit, eBay, and Wikipedia that aggregate user-generated information.

In 2019, Genius, formerly known as Rap Genius, filed a lawsuit in New York State court, accusing Google of copying and displaying its lyrics without authorization, thereby redirecting web traffic that should have gone to the Genius website.

Genius, although not holding copyrights in the lyrics, accused Google of violating its terms of service by unlawfully copying and reposting its work.

The lawsuit specifically highlighted Google’s alleged infringement of lyrics from songs like “Panda” by Desiigner, citing similarities in the posted content.

Genius also claimed that Google copied lyrics from artists such as Kendrick Lamar, Selena Gomez, and Alessia Cara by using watermarks as evidence.

Notably, Genius included a distinctive pattern of apostrophes in its transcriptions, spelling out ‘RED HANDED’ in Morse code. The company argued, “Sure enough, Genius caught Google with its hand in the cookie jar: The ‘RED HANDED’ message soon began to appear in the lyrics in Google’s information boxes.”

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York upheld a ruling in 2022, stating that Genius’ breach-of-contract claims were closely tied to copyright issues and should be pursued through a copyright lawsuit.

Genius appealed this decision to the Supreme Court, arguing that it would allow tech giants like Google to exploit content without consequences and enhance their dominance on the internet.

Google countered by asserting that it possessed licenses for the lyrics in question and claimed that Genius was attempting to create new rights through a supposed contract while disregarding the actual copyright owners.

In May, President Joe Biden’s administration recommended that the Supreme Court reject the appeal made by Genius.

Meera Verma

Share
Published by
Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

14 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

14 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

14 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

15 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

15 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

15 hours ago