International

US Supreme Court Dismisses Nike & Adidas Patent Dispute

The U.S. Supreme Court has recently declined Nike’s request to review a decision made by the U.S. Patent Office tribunal, which canceled a portion of Nike’s shoe patent in the company’s dispute with Adidas.

The court rejected Nike’s appeal, upholding the lower court’s ruling that supported the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s action. Nike was challenging the tribunal’s decision to invalidate certain elements of their patent, arguing that Adidas did not raise the relevant arguments during the proceedings.

This dispute is part of the ongoing patent battles between Nike and Adidas, involving technology used in their respective shoe designs. In 2012, Adidas filed a petition with the patent office tribunal to invalidate one of Nike’s patents related to seamless knitted upper components for athletic sneakers.

Nike had sought to cancel parts of its patent and substitute it with a less extensive claim, but the board granted the cancellation and denied the amendment, citing earlier publications that covered the same invention.

The case was sent back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit multiple times, with Nike filing appeals that were ultimately rejected. Nike argued that the board should not have canceled a substitute patent element without Adidas raising relevant arguments during the proceedings.

In a separate development, the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board ruled that the patent office tribunal retaliated against an administrative judge who objected to the panel’s size changes without informing the parties involved.

The Justice Department recommended that the Supreme Court remand Nike’s case to the Federal Circuit to allow the company to challenge the patent-invalidity decision based on the ruling by the Merit Systems Protection Board.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Gulmarg Fashion Show: Srinagar Court To Hear Case Against Organizers On April 8

A Srinagar court has scheduled a hearing for April 8, 2025, in connection with the…

1 day ago

Gold Smuggling Case: Kannada Actress Ranya Rao Moves Sessions Court For Bail

Kannada actress Ranya Rao, arrested last week in connection with a gold smuggling case, has…

1 day ago

“Advocates Can appear In Confiscation Proceedings Under Forest Act”: MP High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that advocates can represent clients in confiscation cases under…

1 day ago

Cement Prices Are Likely To Increase Because Of New Mineral Tax By States: Report

Cement prices across various states are expected to increase following a Supreme Court ruling that…

1 day ago

“Plaint Against Teacher By Parent, Student: First Enquiry, Then Arrest”: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has laid down new guidelines to protect educators from hasty arrests…

2 days ago

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

3 days ago