![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/69ca44af_4993_P_4_mr-1-1-300x200.jpg)
The Supreme Court in the case Jay Dhande & ors vs Union of India & ors observed and directed the Comptroller of Examinations to reconsider grievances of the students and take appropriate... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/supreme-court-300x169-43.jpg)
The Supreme Court observed the Muslim personal law practice of Talaq-E-Hasan which was mentioned before a vacation bench for urgent listing. A petition was filed before the Supreme Court challenging the Muslim... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Kerala-HC-1-300x200.jpg)
The Kerala High Court directed the State Government to take steps for the resumption of such land, notify and exempt the provisions of required and further the court directed that no quarrying... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/eb04e658_9310_P_2_mr-1-300x200.jpg)
The issue around digital privacy, or rather the lack of it, has been a hot topic of debate in India and has even made its way to the Parliamentary lobbies. In India,... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/supreme-court-300x169-42.jpg)
The Supreme Court in the case National Company Law Tribunal Bar Association Vs Union Of India observed in a petition filed by the NCLT Bar Association challenging the notification of the Ministry... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/supreme-court-300x169-41.jpg)
The Supreme Court in the case Babasaheb Raosaheb Kobarne vs Pyrotek India Private Limited observed with respect to the limitation prescribed under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The Court observed that for... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/supreme-court-300x169-40.jpg)
The Supreme Court in the case Gopal Verma v State of UP observed the recently deprecated act of a judicial officer on the release of the accused despite Court’s order of directing... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/69ca44af_4993_P_4_mr-1-300x200.jpg)
One of the most perplexing yet significant concepts within the Transfer Pricing Dispute Resolution is with regards to the Advertisement, Marking and Promoting (AMP) Expenses that are drawn by the Indian Entities... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/law-6-300x200.jpg)
The Supreme Court in the case Knit Pro International vs State of NCT of Delhi observed that the Copyright Act is a cognizable and non bailable offence of an offence under Section... Read more »
![](https://legally-speaking.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/law-1-6-300x200.jpg)
The Supreme Court in the case Gurmel Singh vs Branch Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd observed that due to circumstances which is beyond the insured control and which the insured is not... Read more »