Legally Speaking

Bound by Duty: Exploring Public Officer Liability in India

Fundamental rights serve as the bedrock of a democratic society, safeguarding the liberties and freedoms of its citizens against state intrusion. Enshrined in the Indian Constitution, these rights ensure the all-around development of individuals and the nation. Article 32 empowers citizens to directly petition the Supreme Court in cases of fundamental rights violations, underscoring the significance of their protection.

Public officers, entrusted with governmental functions for the welfare of the people, play a pivotal role in upholding these rights. However, when they falter in their duties, questions of liability arise. While many nations have codified such liability in their constitutions, India’s legal framework predating its Constitution already held the government accountable for torts committed by its officers.

Despite legal provisions, the reluctance of citizens to confront public officers stems from systemic issues like corruption and bureaucracy. Recent judicial pronouncements emphasize the imperative of addressing breaches of fundamental rights, even by private individuals or public officers, to uphold the Constitution’s sanctity.

A significant case, B.S.N.L v. Pramod V. Sawant, highlighted the accountability of public sector officials for constitutional breaches. While existing laws offer recourse for malfeasance in public office, the absence of stringent statutes perpetuates violations. The Civil Procedure Code outlines procedures for suits involving public officers, yet the absence of a clear definition of malfeasance in Indian law poses challenges.

Nevertheless, codes of conduct and ethical guidelines delineate expected behavior for public servants. Article 310 empowers the government to discipline its servants for misconduct, underscoring the nexus between liability and public trust.

In conclusion, while legal mechanisms exist to address breaches of duty by public officers, the evolving landscape demands comprehensive legislation to ensure accountability and safeguard citizens’ rights. Upholding the principle of liability is not just a legal obligation but a cornerstone of public trust in governance.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International
Payal Singh

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago