Categories: Legally Speaking

Defamation Case: Madhya Pradesh HC Stays Bailable Warrant against Ex-CM Shivraj Singh Chouhan, Ors

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has stayed a special court’s order for the issuance of bailable warrants against former CM Shivraj Singh Chouhan and state BJP president V D Sharma in a criminal defamation case.

The court observed that the two leaders, who are currently contesting in the upcoming Lok Sabha polls, are heavily occupied with campaign activities.

A special court had recently ordered bailable warrants against Chouhan and Sharma for their failure to provide “undertakings” in the criminal defamation case filed by Congress’ Rajya Sabha member Vivek Tankha.

Sharma is seeking re-election from the Khajuraho parliamentary constituency, while Chouhan has been nominated by the BJP from Vidisha.

A single bench of Justice Sanjay Dwivedi, in an interim order, stated, “As an interim measure, the impugned orders dated March 22 and April 2 are directed to be stayed and it is also directed that warrants as directed to be issued against the petitioners shall not be issued till the next date of hearing.”

The High Court justified the stay, considering the ongoing election commitments of the petitioners.

In their plea challenging the special court’s order, petitioners Sharma, Chouhan, and ex-minister Bhupendra Singh emphasized their seniority within the ruling party and their preoccupation with election-related obligations.

Senior Advocate RN Singh, representing the petitioners, argued that the complaint against his clients was politically motivated and aimed at damaging their political careers.

The court acknowledged the petitioners’ respect towards court orders and their commitment to comply with directives.

Further, the court recognized the petitioners’ election engagements as a valid reason for seeking relief from personal appearances in court.

Earlier, the special court had exempted Sharma, Chouhan, and Singh from personal appearance in the case until June 7. However, bailable warrants were later issued on April 2 due to their failure to provide “undertakings”.

The nature of these undertakings remained unclear, prompting the BJP leaders’ lawyer, Shyam Vishwakarma, to seek clarification from the court.

On January 19 last year, the special court had initiated a defamation suit against the BJP leaders based on prima facie evidence, following a complaint by Congress leader Tankha.

Tankha alleged that the BJP leaders had defamed him by falsely implicating him in a Supreme Court case concerning the OBC quota in the 2021 Panchayat elections in the state.

Additionally, Tankha has filed a civil defamation suit against Sharma, Chouhan, and Singh, seeking damages of Rs 10 crore.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

“Wife’s Watching Porn, Self-Pleasure Not Cruelty”: Madras HC Turns Down Husband’s Divorce Plea

The Madras High Court rejected man's request for divorce, dismissing his claims that his wife’s…

10 hours ago

Delhi Riots Case: Delhi HC Lists Tasleem Ahmed’s Bail Plea Before Roster Bench

The Delhi High Court has scheduled the bail plea of Tasleem Ahmed for hearing before…

11 hours ago

Omar Abdullah Announces New Assembly, Salary Hike, Final Amnesty & Heritage Push For J&K

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah made several significant announcements on Thursday during the…

11 hours ago

UP Court Issues Notice To Rahul Gandhi After Complaint Alleges His Words ‘Hurt Sentiments’

A local court in Sambhal has issued a notice to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, requiring…

11 hours ago

“Grabbing Minor’s Breasts, Breaking Pyjama Strings Doesn’t Qualify As Attempt To Rape”: Allahabad HC

A recent judgment by the Allahabad High Court has sparked a critical examination of India's…

12 hours ago

IPL 2025: Saliva Ban Lifted After BCCI Gets Captains’ Nod

The restriction on using saliva to shine the ball will be removed in the 2025…

13 hours ago