Categories: Legally Speaking

Delhi HC Issues Notice on Plea for Women’s Reservation in DHCBA Executive Committee

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Delhi High Court on Monday (August 5) issued a notice to the Bar Council of Delhi (BCD) and the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) regarding a plea seeking the reservation of at least two seats on the DHCBA’s executive committee for women lawyers.

A bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela has scheduled the matter for further hearing on August 12, 2024.

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) will be considered alongside another petition that seeks a 33% reservation for women in the bar associations of the national capital. The new petition has been filed by advocate Fozia Rahman.

The petition requests the reservation of two seats for women advocates in positions such as President, Vice President, Honorary Secretary, Joint Secretary, and Treasurer, either on a rotational basis or through any other method deemed suitable to best serve the Bar’s interests and address the gender imbalance in the DHCBA’s decision-making processes. Alternatively, it seeks a direction to reserve the post of the DHCBA President for women lawyers once every three years. In years when the presidency is contested by all Bar members, the positions of Secretary or Joint Secretary should be reserved for women.

Advocate Rahman contended that there is a lack of gender diversity in the leadership positions of the DHCBA.

The plea states that, “Despite the comprehensive framework of Rule 19 of the DHCBA Rules, there remains a notable absence of gender diversity in the decision-making posts of the Association. The significant growth in the DHCBA’s membership, now exceeding 32,000 members, necessitates an adaptation of the organizational structure to better reflect this increased membership and ensure diverse representation.”

Additionally, Rahman, along with about 200 other advocates, had submitted a representation addressing these issues. However, no decision has yet been made by the respondents.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Shahi Idgah Dispute: Allahabad HC Seeks Muslim Side Response On Plea

The Allahabad High Court, on Wednesday, sought a response from the Muslim side concerning a…

13 hours ago

Corbett Illegal Construction: SC Raps U’khand For Acting Against Top Officers At ‘Snail’s Pace’

The Supreme Court of India on Wednesday expressed strong disapproval of the Uttarakhand government's "snail's…

14 hours ago

Delhi High Court Stays BFI’s March 7 Circular On Election Representation

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday temporarily stayed the Boxing Federation of India's March 7…

15 hours ago

Migrant Workers’ Case: SC Raises Concerns Over Ration Card Misuse, Warns They Have Turned Into ‘Popularity Cards’

Ration cards are now being used as 'popularity cards,' said Justice Surya Kant, in an…

15 hours ago

“F-1 Visa: How Students Can Stay Compliant & Avoid Deportation”

The Trump administration's recent escalation of immigration enforcement, particularly targeting foreign nationals associated with pro-Palestinian…

15 hours ago

Delhi HC Seeks Centre Response After PIL Demands Closure Of Abattoirs Near IGI Airport

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought a response from the Central government regarding a…

17 hours ago