Categories: Legally Speaking

Delhi HC Issues Notice on Plea for Women’s Reservation in DHCBA Executive Committee

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Delhi High Court on Monday (August 5) issued a notice to the Bar Council of Delhi (BCD) and the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) regarding a plea seeking the reservation of at least two seats on the DHCBA’s executive committee for women lawyers.

A bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela has scheduled the matter for further hearing on August 12, 2024.

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) will be considered alongside another petition that seeks a 33% reservation for women in the bar associations of the national capital. The new petition has been filed by advocate Fozia Rahman.

The petition requests the reservation of two seats for women advocates in positions such as President, Vice President, Honorary Secretary, Joint Secretary, and Treasurer, either on a rotational basis or through any other method deemed suitable to best serve the Bar’s interests and address the gender imbalance in the DHCBA’s decision-making processes. Alternatively, it seeks a direction to reserve the post of the DHCBA President for women lawyers once every three years. In years when the presidency is contested by all Bar members, the positions of Secretary or Joint Secretary should be reserved for women.

Advocate Rahman contended that there is a lack of gender diversity in the leadership positions of the DHCBA.

The plea states that, “Despite the comprehensive framework of Rule 19 of the DHCBA Rules, there remains a notable absence of gender diversity in the decision-making posts of the Association. The significant growth in the DHCBA’s membership, now exceeding 32,000 members, necessitates an adaptation of the organizational structure to better reflect this increased membership and ensure diverse representation.”

Additionally, Rahman, along with about 200 other advocates, had submitted a representation addressing these issues. However, no decision has yet been made by the respondents.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Supreme Court Fixes May 14 For Hearing Pleas Against Appointment Of CEC, ECs Under 2023 Law

The Supreme Court on Wednesday scheduled May 14 to hear a batch of petitions challenging…

29 minutes ago

National Herald Case: ED Chargesheets Congress Leaders Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi

The Enforcement Directorate on Tuesday filed a chargesheet in the National Herald money laundering case,…

18 hours ago

Trump May Invoke Insurrection Act On April 20 To Address Border Crisis

One of the first executive actions taken by Donald Trump after returning to the presidency…

18 hours ago

“Hopeful That J-K Will Regain Status Of State”: CM Omar Abdullah

Former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah expressed optimism on Tuesday about the restoration…

18 hours ago

SC Directs Rajasthan HC To Appoint A Person With Low Vision As A Civil Judge

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court on Tuesday directed the Rajasthan High Court to…

19 hours ago

Gurugram Land Case: “Case Mein Kuch Nahin Hai” Says Robert Vadra On ED Summons

Businessman Robert Vadra appeared before the Enforcement Directorate in Delhi on Tuesday in connection with…

20 hours ago