Categories: Legally Speaking

Haryana Govt Moves SC against Order to Remove Shambhu Border Barricades

The Haryana government has approached the Supreme Court to challenge a high court order directing the removal of barricades at the Shambhu border near Ambala, where farmers have been protesting since February 13, 2024.

The state’s appeal, filed through advocate Akshay Amritanshu, cites concerns about the law-and-order situation as the reason for maintaining the blockade.

On July 12, while hearing a related matter, the Supreme Court instructed the Haryana government to dismantle the barricades and questioned its authority to block the highway.

The Haryana government had installed barricades on the Ambala-New Delhi national highway in February after the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (Non-Political) and the Kisan Mazdoor Morcha announced plans for a farmers’ march to Delhi to support various demands, including a legal guarantee of minimum support price (MSP) for crops.

“How can a state block a highway? It has a duty to regulate traffic. We are saying open it but regulate,” a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan remarked on June 12 after the state’s counsel informed the bench of the intention to appeal to the apex court.

Justice Kant advised the state’s counsel, “Why do you want to challenge the high court’s order? Farmers are also citizens of this country. Provide them with food and medical care. They will come, raise slogans, and leave. I assume you don’t commute by road.” These comments were made while the Supreme Court was hearing a plea from the Haryana government challenging a March 7 decision by the Punjab and Haryana High Court to establish a committee led by a former high court judge to investigate the death of farmer Shubhkaran Singh during a clash between protesters and Haryana security personnel in February.

Singh, 21, from Bathinda, was killed, and several police personnel were injured in clashes at Khanauri on the Punjab-Haryana border on February 21. The clashes occurred when protesting farmers attempted to approach the barricades at the border and were stopped by security personnel.

In its order, the high court had also stated that if any law-and-order issues arise, the state government could take preventive measures according to the law. It issued a similar directive to the Punjab government to ensure law and order while also ordering the removal of barricades on its side of the border.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Nunnem Gangte

Share
Published by
Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago