Categories: Legally Speaking

SC Closes PIL Claiming Statutory Panels in J&K Are Non-Functional

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Supreme Court on Tuesday closed the proceedings on a PIL that claimed statutory panels in Jammu and Kashmir were non-functional.

The court was informed by the Union Territory administration that these panels are now operational and that the powers of some, such as the State Human Rights Commission, are being exercised by the NHRC.

Earlier, the top court had issued notices to the Centre regarding the 2020 PIL filed by Pune-based lawyer Asim Suhas Sarode and had sought the assistance of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta in resolving the matter.

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) alleged that statutory panels, including the State Human Rights Commission, have been non-functional in the Union Territory following the abrogation of Article 370, which had granted special status to the former state. The PIL pointed out that seven panels, including the Jammu and Kashmir State Commission for Women, the State Commission for Persons with Disabilities, and the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, are non-operational.

A bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice JB Pardiwala took note of submissions from the Solicitor General that the statutory panels are indeed functional, and some of their powers are now exercised by central panels due to the change in the status of Jammu and Kashmir. The law officer mentioned that the powers of three out of the seven commissions are being exercised by central panels, while the remaining ones are functional in the Union Territory. He also cited an affidavit from the law, justice, and parliamentary affairs department of Jammu and Kashmir in support of his statements.

“We will close the case,” the bench stated.

“It has been submitted that with the passage of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Bill, the laws applicable to Union Territories are now applicable to Jammu and Kashmir. Moreover, the central government has the authority to direct central commissions to function as state commissions,” the bench noted. Consequently, the PIL was disposed of, as the plea had become infructuous and no further directions were deemed necessary.

The petitioner had included the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), the National Human Rights Commission, and the Law Commission of India as parties to the PIL. In August 2019, the Centre bifurcated Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories and abrogated Article 370 of the Constitution, which had accorded special status to the erstwhile state.

The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on August 5, 2019, and passed the same day. The Lok Sabha cleared it the following day.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International
Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

2 days ago

Supreme Court To Hear Plea To Debar Poll Candidates Charged For Serious Offences On Mar 18

The Supreme Court is set to hear a plea on March 18 that seeks to…

2 days ago

Bombay HC Grants Pension Benefits To Former Judge Pushpa Ganediwala

The Bombay High Court has ruled in favor of former Additional Judge Pushpa Ganediwala, granting…

2 days ago

Bombay HC Sets Aside Complaint Against Kailash Kher For Hurting Religious Feelings

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a complaint against singer Kailash Kher, which alleged that…

2 days ago

Uttarakhand HC Stays Proposed Felling Of 3,300 Trees In Shivalik Elephant Reserve

The Uttarakhand High Court has put a temporary halt on the felling of 3,300 trees…

2 days ago

“Notify Posts For Special Education Teachers By March 28”: Supreme Court To States, UTs

The Supreme Court has directed all states and Union Territories to notify the sanctioned posts…

2 days ago