Legally Speaking

Unveiling Section 279 IPC: Decoding Rash Driving

The advent of automobiles not only offered new experiences and skills but also opened up employment opportunities, even for the affluent, to own personal vehicles.

However, it also brought about various incidents leading to fatalities, injuries, accidents, and damages, prompting legislative measures to prevent such occurrences. Despite these laws, India continues to face such incidents where legal provisions come into play to provide remedies.

Rash Driving

Rash or negligent driving, though seemingly minor, encompasses various legal aspects. While Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code defines rash driving on public roads, other IPC provisions like Sections 337 (causing hurt) and 338 (causing grievous hurt) are crucial to consider in this context.

Section 279 IPC

Section 279 IPC deals with rash driving or riding on a public road. It defines reckless and negligent behavior when a driver fails to adhere to driving regulations, indicating impulsivity or carelessness.

However, merely driving fast does not always constitute rash driving; it depends on the driver’s ability to control the vehicle and the traffic conditions. For instance, if the road is empty and the driver can maintain control of the vehicle, it may not be considered rash driving.

Additionally, speed limits set by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways may justify driving at higher speeds on designated highways. Nevertheless, if a driver operates a vehicle without due care and consideration, they may be deemed guilty under Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code.

Punishment:

For breaching Section 279 IPC, the perpetrator faces imprisonment for up to six months, or a fine of up to one thousand rupees, or both.

In The Action

Under Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code, careless or negligent riding on a public road is also considered an offense. A public road refers to any pathway frequented by the public for walking or vehicle passage, such as sidewalks, streets, and highways.

While individuals have the right to move freely on these pathways, driving a vehicle recklessly or negligently, resulting in harm or injury to another person (excluding death), whether intentional or accidental, constitutes an offense punishable under this section.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Payal Singh

Share
Published by
Payal Singh

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago