Legally Speaking

Unveiling Section 279 IPC: Decoding Rash Driving

The advent of automobiles not only offered new experiences and skills but also opened up employment opportunities, even for the affluent, to own personal vehicles.

However, it also brought about various incidents leading to fatalities, injuries, accidents, and damages, prompting legislative measures to prevent such occurrences. Despite these laws, India continues to face such incidents where legal provisions come into play to provide remedies.

Rash Driving

Rash or negligent driving, though seemingly minor, encompasses various legal aspects. While Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code defines rash driving on public roads, other IPC provisions like Sections 337 (causing hurt) and 338 (causing grievous hurt) are crucial to consider in this context.

Section 279 IPC

Section 279 IPC deals with rash driving or riding on a public road. It defines reckless and negligent behavior when a driver fails to adhere to driving regulations, indicating impulsivity or carelessness.

However, merely driving fast does not always constitute rash driving; it depends on the driver’s ability to control the vehicle and the traffic conditions. For instance, if the road is empty and the driver can maintain control of the vehicle, it may not be considered rash driving.

Additionally, speed limits set by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways may justify driving at higher speeds on designated highways. Nevertheless, if a driver operates a vehicle without due care and consideration, they may be deemed guilty under Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code.

Punishment:

For breaching Section 279 IPC, the perpetrator faces imprisonment for up to six months, or a fine of up to one thousand rupees, or both.

In The Action

Under Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code, careless or negligent riding on a public road is also considered an offense. A public road refers to any pathway frequented by the public for walking or vehicle passage, such as sidewalks, streets, and highways.

While individuals have the right to move freely on these pathways, driving a vehicle recklessly or negligently, resulting in harm or injury to another person (excluding death), whether intentional or accidental, constitutes an offense punishable under this section.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtOther CourtsInternational

Payal Singh

Share
Published by
Payal Singh

Recent Posts

Punjab & Haryana HC Notice To Jindal Law School Over AI-Generated Exam Claims

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…

2 hours ago

ED Files Money Laundering Complaint Against Charanjit Singh Bajaj, 4 Others

The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…

2 hours ago

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

3 hours ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

4 hours ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

4 hours ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

5 hours ago