National

Arvind Kejriwal Spared, Atishi Summoned in Defamation Case by BJP Leader

Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court has refused to summon Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in a criminal complaint filed by a BJP leader who accused him of defamation for alleging that AAP leaders were approached to join the saffron party in return for cash.

However, Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Tanya Bamniyal summoned AAP leader Atishi, stating that “prima facie” there was sufficient evidence against her in the matter.

The judge directed Atishi, a minister in the Kejriwal cabinet, to appear before the court on June 29.

The case was filed by BJP leader Praveen Shankar Kapoor against Arvind Kejriwal and Atishi over the poaching allegations made by the two.

Court’s Analysis

“Having considered the facts and circumstances, the testimonies of the complainant’s witnesses, and the evidence placed on record, it prima facie appears that the alleged accused no. 1 (Atishi) has made specific defamatory statements as aforementioned against the complainant,” the judge stated.

Further, the judge said, “It prima facie appears that the aforementioned defamatory statements made by Atishi have been sufficiently published in the electronic media/social media, which may cause right-thinking members of society to hold negative views against the complainant.”

“It appears that Atishi, through her spoken words and written statements intended to be read, has made defamatory imputations that prima facie have tarnished the reputation of the complainant among right-thinking members of society. This has been done with the knowledge and intention to harm the complainant’s reputation,” the judge added.

No Offence Established Against Kejriwal

“However, in view of the reasons stated above, ‘no prima facie offence is established against Kejriwal’,” the judge clarified.

“Therefore, based on the above discussion, there exist sufficient grounds to summon accused Atishi Marlena under section 500 (defamation) IPC,” the judge concluded.

Kapoor alleged that the claims made by the two senior AAP leaders against the BJP are false, stating that the duo had not provided any material to substantiate the allegations.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, Other Courts, International

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Supreme Court Says “Marriage Is Relationship Built On Mutual Trust, Companionship”

The Supreme Court has upheld a decision by the Madras High Court granting a divorce…

1 day ago

Delhi HC Grants Anticipatory Bail To Lawyer In Brother’s Criminal Case

The Delhi High Court has granted transit anticipatory bail to a lawyer whose brother is…

2 days ago

Justice Madan B Lokur Appointed As Chairperson of UN Internal Justice Council

Former Supreme Court Justice Madan B Lokur has been recently named the chairperson of the…

2 days ago

Karnataka High Court Directs NLSIU To Implement 0.5% Reservation For Transgender Persons

The Karnataka High Court has recently directed the National Law School of India University (NLSIU)…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Directs UP Vigilance To Investigate Himalayan Cooperative Housing Land Issue

The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Vigilance Department to investigate the Himalayan…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Grants Stay On Mohammed Zubair’s Arrest In Religious Enmity Case

The Allahabad High Court on Friday issued an order staying the arrest of Mohammed Zubair,…

2 days ago