Categories: National

Calcutta HC Stays Its Order Directing Group D Employees To Refund Salaries

The Calcutta High Court has recently stayed the portion of its previous order directing 1911 Group D employees to refund salaries.

On 10th February, a single judge had ordered for cancellation of appointments of the appellants (Achinta Kumar Mondal & Ors. & Laxmi Tunga and Ors), who were serving in Group ‘D’ Posts selected in the 2016 Recruitment Process after their OMR sheets were found to be manipulated.

The division bench of Justice Subrata Talukdar and Justice Supratim Bhattacharya directed that there will be a stay only of the portion of the Order directing the appellants to refund salaries.

“At this stage, considering the principles of balance of convenience and double jeopardy, there shall be only a stay of the portion of the Order directing the appellants to refund salaries from the date of their appointments as stated in Paragraph 19 of the Order dated 10th February, 2023, until further orders.”, the bench stated.

Appearing for appellants, advocate Partha Sarathi Deb Barman submitted that the Single Bench passed drastic orders without granting them the opportunity of being heard.

Additionally, it was stated that the appellants not only risk losing their jobs but also risk having their applications for future gainful employment rejected. They have also been ordered to return their earnings.

On the other hand, appearing for the respondents (State of West Bengal & Ors), advocate Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya submitted that the orders impugned are the culmination of orders by which the Single Bench adjudicated the issues.

They contended that the Single Bench correctly directed the cancellation of 1911 candidates’ appointments.

The appointments of 1911 candidates were cancelled by the Single Judge after the Court determined that the candidates were recommended due to manipulation of their OMR sheets during the 2016 Recruitment Process.

The Court has scheduled the next hearing on March 3, 2023.

Nunnem Gangte

Share
Published by
Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago