National

Kashmir: Central govt constitutes Tribunal to Examine the legality of ‘ban’ on Jamaat-e-Islami

Kashmir: Central government constitutes Tribunal to Examine the legality of ‘ban’ on Jamaat-e-Islami

The Central Government has formed the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Tribunal, appointing a Delhi High Court judge to determine whether there are valid grounds for designating Jamaat-e-Islami, Jammu and Kashmir (JeI) as an ‘unlawful association’. This decision was announced through a notification issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) on Wednesday.

In its notification, the MHA referenced the declaration of Jamaat-e-Islami, Jammu and Kashmir (JeI) as an unlawful association on February 27, 2024, published in the Gazette of India. Consequently, exercising authority conferred by relevant sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, the Central Government constituted the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Tribunal, with Justice Navin Chawla, Judge of the High Court of Delhi, as its member for the purpose of adjudication.

Earlier, on February 27, the MHA had extended the ban on Jamaat-e-Islami-J-K under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 for another five years. Union Home Minister Amit Shah, via his official handle, reiterated the government’s commitment to zero tolerance against terrorism and separatism, emphasizing the continuation of the ban on Jamaat-e-Islami-Jammu Kashmir for five more years.

Highlighting the organization’s activities deemed detrimental to the nation’s security, integrity, and sovereignty, Shah emphasized that any threats to national security would face decisive action. The Centre had initially banned JeI-J-K, categorizing it as an ‘unlawful association’ under the UA(P)A on February 28, 2019. The notification at that time cited JeI’s alleged connections with militant groups, support for extremism and militancy, and involvement in anti-national and subversive activities aimed at causing disaffection in the country.

Ashish Sinha

-Ashish Kumar Sinha -Editor Legally Speaking -Ram Nath Goenka awardee - 14 Years of Experience in Media - Covering Courts Since 2008

Share
Published by
Ashish Sinha

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago