National

Delhi HC Bashes PMLA Adjudicating Authority Against Use Of “Disconcerting Language” In Orders

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Delhi High Court recently bashed the Adjudicating Authority under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) against using “templated paragraphs” and “disconcerting language” in its orders.

A single bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh ruled that if the Authority used such language, the Court would be forced to direct that action be taken against it. “Repeated use of templated paragraphs, as though the principles of Natural Justice are mere rhetoric, is not permissible. The present order shall be treated as a warning to the concerned authority to not use such language as extracted below in its orders, failing which the Court would be constrained to direct action to be taken,” the order reads.

The Court made these stern remarks while noting that the Authority had failed to consider the fact that the use of such disturbing language had been frowned upon by the High Court in the case of Dr US Awasthi v. Adjucating Authority PMLA & Anr.

The single bench was dealing with a plea challenging an order dated March 6, 2023 issued by the Adjudicating Authority in which the petitioner’s application for right to cross-examine witnesses had been rejected.

Counsel for the petitioner told the Court that the Authority used the same language that was condemned in Dr US Awasthi’s judgment.

In its order, the Adjudicating Authority stated, in reference to the petitioner’s claim of violation of natural justice principles, that “it is always open to the accused of the alleged offenders to make more noise about the so-called violation of natural justice principles.”

According to the Authority, “such noise can be heard quite frequently in these type of matters with a view to dragging the proceedings and stifling the efforts of the authorities concerned to pin down the offenders to the crime in furtherance of the provisions of the Act.”

While taking a dim view of the language used in the order, the Court said that it would be appealable before the Appellate Tribunal, PMLA.

 

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Madras HC Grants Interim Anticipatory Bail To Comedian Kunal Kamra

The Madras High Court on Friday granted stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra interim transit anticipatory bail…

5 hours ago

“Restaurants Can’t Force Customers To Pay Service Charge”: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court on Friday ruled that payment of service charge by customers at…

6 hours ago

Delhi HC Orders Engineer Rashid To Deposit Over ₹3.35 Lakh To Attend Parliament

The Delhi High Court on Friday directed Jammu and Kashmir Member of Parliament (MP), Abdul…

6 hours ago

Kerala HC Dissolves Petitions Seeking Probe Against CM Pinarayi Vijayan And His Daughter

The Kerala High Court on Friday dismissed 2 petitions seeking an investigation into allegations of…

7 hours ago

Supreme Court Sets Aside Plea For FIR Against Justice Yashwant Varma, Says Inquiry Ongoing

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a petition seeking an FIR against Justice Yashwant Varma,…

8 hours ago

Staff Appointment Case: Madhya Pradesh HC Gives AIIMS Bhopal ‘Last Chance’ To Respond

The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Friday issued a “last chance” to the All Indian…

9 hours ago