हिंदी

Delhi Police Files Charge Sheet Against 7 Accused In Kanjhawala Hit & Drag Case

The Delhi Police has filed a charge sheet today against seven accused in the Kanjhawala hit and drag case.

DCP Outer Harender Singh stated that “Delhi police will file a charge sheet against 7 accused in the case. Delhi Police have invoked murder, destruction of evidence, conspiracy, and other sections against four accused namely Manoj, Mithun, Krishan, and Amit. The other two accused Ashutosh and Ankush have been implicated under sections related to the destruction of evidence, criminal conspiracy, and other offenses.”

The police filed a nearly 800-pages charge sheet, said sources. Delhi Police have already invoked section 302 IPC in the FIR. Initially, the FIR was registered under sections 120B, 304, 279, and 201 and other sections of the IPC.

Seven accused persons were arrested in connection with the case, of whom two were later granted bail.

The accused Manoj Mittal, Deepak Khanna, Amit Khanna, Krishan, and Mithun were arrested on January 1. They are in judicial custody following interrogation.
The other two accused, Ashutosh and Ankush, were arrested later on.

Therefore, the investigating officer will file the chargesheet before the metropolitan magistrate Sanya Dalal.

In what was a shocking incident at the Shani Bazar Road, the victim was dragged 13 kilometers under a car. The accused drove around two hours in the car, Delhi police submitted while seeking the remand of the accused persons.

The CCTV footage and Call Detail Record (CDR) collected during the investigation may be crucial evidence disclosure in a charge sheet.

Delhi police also submitted that the accused, Deepak was planted by the other accused persons in the case.

Later, the Delhi police submitted that the CCTV footage was collected from a petrol pump and a place where the accused took food.

Earlier, the investing officer (IO) told the court that Deepak was behind the wheels of the vehicle. Later on, it was revealed through the CDR that he was planted as an accused who has a driving license.
The special public prosecutor (SPP) Atul Srivastava also submitted that the section of murder was added in the FIR as they had the knowledge that a body was under the vehicle and still kept on driving. It showed their intention, police claimed.

The SPP further submitted that a section of the destruction of evidence under section 201 of IPC was also invoked as the accused planted a man, who was not driving the car.

It was also submitted by SPP Shrivastav that all the accused persons committed the offense in a planned manner because of which their offense attracted a section of criminal conspiracy under 120B of IPC.

Recommended For You

About the Author: Meera Verma

SC Seeks 33% Women’s Quota in Gujarat Bar Associations SC Lifts Stay On Tree Felling For Mathura-Jhansi Railway Line Construction Bring ‘Logical Conclusion’ To Atrocities Case Against Nawab Malik: Bombay HC To Police Delhi Court Issues Notice To BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj In Civil Defamation Suit Filed By Satyendra Jain Uttarakhand HC Seeks Report On ‘Cracks’ Appearing In Houses In Bageshwar