Delhi Riots Case: Prosecution Labels Inquiry Of Accused On Investigation Status As Baseless

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The prosecution on Tuesday termed as “frivolous,” “speculative,” and “presumptive” the applications of some accused filed to know the investigation status in a case pertaining to the alleged conspiracy behind the 2020 northeast Delhi riots.

Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat heard the applications filed by accused Devangana Kalita, Natasha Narwal, Asif Iqbal Tanha, Meeran Haider, and Athar Khan.

Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad stated that each application fails to disclose any provision in law that could allow their prayers. He stated that the applications were “frivolous” as they were beyond the ambit of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

He stated, “These prayers are speculative and presumptive. These prayers go on the assumption that framing of charges attains finality.”

On judgments cited by the accused in their applications, the SPP stated none of the verdicts gives any power to entertain the application in this manner, nor any power to go beyond the CrPC. SPP stated, “Applications are nothing but attempts to derail the trial.”

Earlier, in their applications filed on Monday, Haider wanted to know from the Delhi Police whether the investigation in the matter was complete, while Khan sought deferment or adjournment of the arguments on charges till the investigation completion.

Previously on September 14, Devangana Kalita, Natasha Narwal, and Asif Iqbal Tanha sought direction to the investigating agency to clarify the status of their investigation in the case lodged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, before arguments start on whether to frame the charges. ASJ Rawat has posted the matter for further proceedings for Friday.

Furthermore, the accused have been booked under anti-terror UAPA and several provisions of the IPC for allegedly being the “masterminds” of the February 2020 riots, which left 53 people dead and over 700 injured.

The violence erupted during the protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act and the National Register of Citizens during the week US President Donald Trump was on a visit to India.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

2 days ago

Supreme Court To Hear Plea To Debar Poll Candidates Charged For Serious Offences On Mar 18

The Supreme Court is set to hear a plea on March 18 that seeks to…

2 days ago

Bombay HC Grants Pension Benefits To Former Judge Pushpa Ganediwala

The Bombay High Court has ruled in favor of former Additional Judge Pushpa Ganediwala, granting…

2 days ago

Bombay HC Sets Aside Complaint Against Kailash Kher For Hurting Religious Feelings

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a complaint against singer Kailash Kher, which alleged that…

2 days ago

Uttarakhand HC Stays Proposed Felling Of 3,300 Trees In Shivalik Elephant Reserve

The Uttarakhand High Court has put a temporary halt on the felling of 3,300 trees…

2 days ago

“Notify Posts For Special Education Teachers By March 28”: Supreme Court To States, UTs

The Supreme Court has directed all states and Union Territories to notify the sanctioned posts…

2 days ago