National

Election Law Violation: SC Defers Hearing Of Kejriwal’s Plea Against Proceedings In UP

The Supreme Court on Tuesday adjourned the hearing of a plea by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal for four weeks seeking discharge in a case against him for allegedly making objectionable remarks against the BJP and the Congress in Uttar Pradesh during the 2014 Lok Sabha poll campaign.

Kejriwal has moved to the apex court against an order of the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court which declined to discharge him in the criminal case pending before Sultanpur trial court.

A bench comprising of Justices MM Sundresh and JB Pardiwala noted there was a request for adjournment by Kejriwal’s counsel.

Furthermore, the top court stated that it will take up the matter after four weeks.

Kejriwal has been accused of promoting enmity between classes in connection with elections under section 125 of the Representation of the People (RP) Act, 1951.

On the campaign trail, Kejriwal alleged, “Jo Congress ko vote dega, mera manana hoga, desh ke saath gaddari hogi…. Joh Bhajapa (BJP) ko vote dega use Khuda bhi maaf nahin karega (Those who will vote for the Congress will be betraying the nation, and God will not forgive those who will vote for the BJP).”

In his plea before the apex court, Kejriwal stated that the petition raises some important questions of law, including whether a case under section 125 of the Act can be made out without there being any video clip or full transcript of the alleged speech made by him.

The plea stated, while campaigning on May 2, 2014, Kejriwal uttered some sentences that amounted to commission of offence under section 125 of the Act.

Furthermore, the petition said that a complaint was filed against him two days after the alleged utterances by the AAP leader.

Though the complaint alleged violation of only the Model Code of Conduct, the police registered an FIR on the very same day under section 125 of RP Act.

Kejriwal stated that this was done without any independent inquiry by the police. The plea submitted, it clearly shows the “biasness and the action taken post-haste” by the police.

It stated that it is the petitioner’s case that there is no proof or evidence that he had made such alleged utterance and hence, the very basic foundational evidence to prosecute him is absent in the matter.

The petition stated merely mentioning God (Khuda) can’t amount to promoting enmity and hatred between different classes of citizens.

It stated, “Alleged utterance by the petitioner does not refer to any particular caste or religion and hence, by no stretch of imagination such an alleged utterance can promote the feeling of enmity or hatred amongst different classes of citizens.”

The plea said Kejriwal didn’t refer to any religion or caste but only a political party, and a political party can’t be considered as a class of citizens for the purposes of section 125 of the Act.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Centre Opposes Ex-Judges Panel To Monitor Stubble Burning In SC

The Centre on Friday opposed a proposal in the Supreme Court to form a committee…

12 hours ago

“It’s A Celebration For Us”: Delhi HC Bar Association Felicitates CJI Sanjiv Khanna

The Delhi High Court Bar Association on Friday honored Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv…

12 hours ago

International Criminal Court Issues Arrest Warrant For Israeli PM Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,…

13 hours ago

Cal HC Stays Demolition Of Illegal Constructions In WB’s Mandarmoni

The Calcutta High Court on Friday granted an interim stay on the demolition of alleged…

13 hours ago

SC To Pass Order On Pleas To Efface Words ‘Secular’, ‘Socialist’ From Preamble

The Supreme Court on Friday announced that it would deliver its order on November 25…

14 hours ago

Air Pollution: SC Questions Delhi Govt On Truck Entry Amid GRAP-4 Restrictions

The Supreme Court raised concerns on Friday about the "drastic" consequences of the GRAP Stage…

14 hours ago