National

“Engineer Rashid Can’t Be Allowed To Use Legislator Status For Reprieve”: NIA To Delhi HC

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Monday opposed jailed Jammu and Kashmir MP Sheikh Abdul Rashid’s plea for custody parole or interim bail, asserting that his parliamentary status could not exempt him from the rigors of imprisonment.

NIA’s Arguments

Responding to Rashid’s challenge against a March 10 trial court order denying him permission to attend Lok Sabha proceedings until April 4, the NIA stated:

Rashid faces serious charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and has no enforceable right to attend Parliament while in custody.

He was accused of “forum shopping” and attempting to use his parliamentary status to bypass due legal process.

Legislators in lawful detention do not have a statutory right to attend House sessions.

At the time of filing his Lok Sabha nomination, Rashid was already facing trial under UAPA. His election as MP does not change his legal standing.

He remains a highly influential figure who could influence witnesses in Jammu and Kashmir if granted bail.

Legal Proceedings

Rashid, the Baramulla MP who defeated former J&K CM Omar Abdullah in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, has been in Tihar Jail since 2019.

He was arrested by the NIA in 2019 over allegations of terror funding for separatist groups in Jammu and Kashmir.

His name surfaced in the 2017 terror-funding case during the interrogation of co-accused businessman Zahoor Watali.

In March 2022, a special NIA court framed charges against Rashid under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and UAPA, including:

120B (Criminal Conspiracy)

121 (Waging war against the Government of India)

124A (Sedition)

Terrorist Acts & Terror Funding Under UAPA

Court’s Response

The Delhi High Court had earlier sought NIA’s response to Rashid’s plea on March 12. Rashid’s counsel urged the court to permit him custody parole, similar to a previous two-day reprieve.

NIA, however, argued that, summons issued by the President for MPs to attend Parliament are a routine matter, not a special privilege for Rashid.

His interim bail requests have been repeatedly denied, and his appeal does not meet the strict bail conditions under Section 43D(5) of UAPA.

The next hearing on Rashid’s regular bail plea is set for March 19.

Read More: Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtStates High CourtInternational

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago