National

Go First Insolvency: NCLAT Defers Verdict On Appeal Against This Case

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

In the case of Go First, Airline National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has recently reserved its verdict on 3 lessors’ appeals challenging the order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal of the interim stoppage & insolvency resolution proceedings.

Justice Ashok Bhushan led bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Court on Monday evening that reserved the judgment for May 22.

Justice Bhushan-led bench of the NCLAT stating that, “We are reserving the judgment for May 22.”

The appeal was filed by 3 Go first lessors SMBC Aviation Capital Ltd, SFV Aircraft Holdings, and GY Aviation Lease Court Ltd before the NCLAT Court against Go First’s voluntary insolvency resolution proceedings.

Therefore, the lessors were opposing the NCLT judgment which had gone in favor of Go First and given a go-head for Interim Resolution Professional and interim moratorium.

On Friday, NCLAT deferred the matter pertaining to Go First lessors’ petition seeking a stay on a bankruptcy court’s order allowing voluntary insolvency of the low-cost airline to Monday.

On May 10, the NCLT admitted Go First’s plea for spontaneous insolvency that admitted for the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) proceedings. NCLT granted Go First protection under a moratorium from the recovery by lessors & lenders.

In its orders, NCLT stated that, “We admit the plea of Go Airlines for insolvency proceedings. It said that we appoint Abhilash Lal as IRP (insolvency resolution professional).”

The order stated that “The suspended board of directors will cooperate with the IRP. Suspended directors are also ordered to deposit ₹ 5 crores to make the immediate expenses.”

Also, the budget airline cancelled all the flights’ operations till May 19 due to operational reasons, “Go First flights until 19th May 2023 are canceled. We apologize for the inconvenience caused & request customers.”

US-based jet manufacturers Pratt and Whitney (P-W) has defended itself against the budget airline’s claim that P-W is responsible for the financial condition & bankruptcy.

Pratt and Whitney spokesperson told media that, “Go First’s allegations that Pratt and Whitney is responsible for its financial condition are without merit. Pratt and Whitney will vigorously defend itself against Go’s claims, and is pursuing its own legal recourse.”

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Madras HC Grants Interim Anticipatory Bail To Comedian Kunal Kamra

The Madras High Court on Friday granted stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra interim transit anticipatory bail…

51 minutes ago

“Restaurants Can’t Force Customers To Pay Service Charge”: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court on Friday ruled that payment of service charge by customers at…

1 hour ago

Delhi HC Orders Engineer Rashid To Deposit Over ₹3.35 Lakh To Attend Parliament

The Delhi High Court on Friday directed Jammu and Kashmir Member of Parliament (MP), Abdul…

2 hours ago

Kerala HC Dissolves Petitions Seeking Probe Against CM Pinarayi Vijayan And His Daughter

The Kerala High Court on Friday dismissed 2 petitions seeking an investigation into allegations of…

2 hours ago

Supreme Court Sets Aside Plea For FIR Against Justice Yashwant Varma, Says Inquiry Ongoing

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a petition seeking an FIR against Justice Yashwant Varma,…

4 hours ago

Staff Appointment Case: Madhya Pradesh HC Gives AIIMS Bhopal ‘Last Chance’ To Respond

The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Friday issued a “last chance” to the All Indian…

4 hours ago