Law On Assault Of Public Servant: Par Panel Suggests Reduction Of Punishment To 1 Year

A parliamentary panel on Thursday has recommended that 2 years imprisonment given to anyone who assaults/uses criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty should be reduced to 1 year after taking into account submissions of some MPs that the law is widely “misused”.

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs headed by BJP member Brij Lal made the recommendation after examining the 3 proposed criminal laws.

In its report, the panel noted that some members of the committee submitted that section 353 under IPC, which corresponds to clause 130 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita is “widely misused by public servants in the name of deterrence”.

It stated, “As the political demonstrations are the soul of democracy and there are instances in the past when political leaders were harassed and falsely convicted for offences under this section of IPC while demonstrating, therefore, it was suggested that the punishment under this clause may be reduced. The committee agrees with the submission made before it and recommends that the punishment provided under clause 130 may be reduced from two years to one year.”

The clause 130 of BNS states: Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any person being a public servant in the execution of his duty as such public servant, or with intent to prevent or deter that person from discharging his duty as such public servant, or in consequence of anything done or attempted to be done by such person in the lawful discharge of his duty as such public servant, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 2 years, or with fine, or with both. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS-2023) bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha on August 11 along with Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS-2023) and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA-2023) bills.

The 3 proposed laws seek to replace the Code of Criminal Procedure Act, 1898, the IPC, 1860, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, respectively.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Punjab & Haryana HC Notice To Jindal Law School Over AI-Generated Exam Claims

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…

3 hours ago

ED Files Money Laundering Complaint Against Charanjit Singh Bajaj, 4 Others

The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…

3 hours ago

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

5 hours ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

5 hours ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

6 hours ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

6 hours ago