Law On Assault Of Public Servant: Par Panel Suggests Reduction Of Punishment To 1 Year

A parliamentary panel on Thursday has recommended that 2 years imprisonment given to anyone who assaults/uses criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty should be reduced to 1 year after taking into account submissions of some MPs that the law is widely “misused”.

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs headed by BJP member Brij Lal made the recommendation after examining the 3 proposed criminal laws.

In its report, the panel noted that some members of the committee submitted that section 353 under IPC, which corresponds to clause 130 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita is “widely misused by public servants in the name of deterrence”.

It stated, “As the political demonstrations are the soul of democracy and there are instances in the past when political leaders were harassed and falsely convicted for offences under this section of IPC while demonstrating, therefore, it was suggested that the punishment under this clause may be reduced. The committee agrees with the submission made before it and recommends that the punishment provided under clause 130 may be reduced from two years to one year.”

The clause 130 of BNS states: Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any person being a public servant in the execution of his duty as such public servant, or with intent to prevent or deter that person from discharging his duty as such public servant, or in consequence of anything done or attempted to be done by such person in the lawful discharge of his duty as such public servant, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 2 years, or with fine, or with both. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS-2023) bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha on August 11 along with Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS-2023) and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA-2023) bills.

The 3 proposed laws seek to replace the Code of Criminal Procedure Act, 1898, the IPC, 1860, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, respectively.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Delhi Wakes Up To Thick Smog, AQI Stays In ‘Very Poor’ Zone

Delhi experienced a slight improvement in air quality on Tuesday, transitioning from last week's 'severe'…

17 seconds ago

“Constitution A Way Of Life To Be Lived Up To”: CJI Sanjiv Khanna On Constitution Day

Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna on Tuesday commemorated Constitution Day at the Supreme Court…

19 minutes ago

Delhi HC Slams State Departments Over Flyover Repair Dispute

The Delhi High Court on Monday expressed concern over a fund dispute between 2 wings…

19 hours ago

Delhi Pollution Crisis: SC Orders CAQM To Reopen Schools Amid Concerns

The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Commission for Air Quality Management to review its…

20 hours ago

SC Orders SIT Probe Into RG Kar Custodial Torture, Weekly Reports To HC

The Supreme Court on Monday ordered a Special Investigation Team to probe allegations of torture…

21 hours ago

“Fair Probe To Be Conducted Into Sambhal Violence”: UP Deputy CM Brajesh Pathak

Violence erupted in Sambhal, UP, following a controversial survey at a Mughal-era mosque, leading to…

22 hours ago