Law On Assault Of Public Servant: Par Panel Suggests Reduction Of Punishment To 1 Year

A parliamentary panel on Thursday has recommended that 2 years imprisonment given to anyone who assaults/uses criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty should be reduced to 1 year after taking into account submissions of some MPs that the law is widely “misused”.

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs headed by BJP member Brij Lal made the recommendation after examining the 3 proposed criminal laws.

In its report, the panel noted that some members of the committee submitted that section 353 under IPC, which corresponds to clause 130 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita is “widely misused by public servants in the name of deterrence”.

It stated, “As the political demonstrations are the soul of democracy and there are instances in the past when political leaders were harassed and falsely convicted for offences under this section of IPC while demonstrating, therefore, it was suggested that the punishment under this clause may be reduced. The committee agrees with the submission made before it and recommends that the punishment provided under clause 130 may be reduced from two years to one year.”

The clause 130 of BNS states: Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any person being a public servant in the execution of his duty as such public servant, or with intent to prevent or deter that person from discharging his duty as such public servant, or in consequence of anything done or attempted to be done by such person in the lawful discharge of his duty as such public servant, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 2 years, or with fine, or with both. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS-2023) bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha on August 11 along with Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS-2023) and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA-2023) bills.

The 3 proposed laws seek to replace the Code of Criminal Procedure Act, 1898, the IPC, 1860, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, respectively.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago