Madras HC Halts Google’s Removal Of Matrimony, 13 Apps From Play Store

The Madras High Court in a recent judgement has temporarily restrained Google from delisting Matrimony.com and 13 other digital companies from its Play Store.

A bench comprising Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice PD Audikesavalu granted interim injunction while hearing the final arguments pertaining to a batch of appeals presented by Matrimony and others contesting a single judge’s decision that denied them relief.

On August 8, a single judge of the Madras High Court dismissed 14 out of 16 pleas originating from Indian startups and technological corporations, including Bharat Matrimony, Shaadi.com, and Unacademy, against Google’s application billing policy.

The single judge, Justice S Sounthar, established that this matter has been held within the jurisdiction of the Competition Commission of India and underscored that the remedies offered under the Competition Act were notably more comprehensive than those available within a civil court.

The two remaining petitions, challenging the newly introduced billing system, were lodged by Disney+ Hotstar and Testbook.

Senior Counsel P Chidambaram, representing Matrimony.com, apprised the division bench that the single judge had not cited judgments or law or jurisprudence to justify the assertion that digital firms could not seek recourse within a civil court.

He stated, “By this argument, I can’t file a suit against a bank because RBI is the authority. That is not the case. Suits are filed against banks every day. It will not take away my right to sue. To the extent that the CCI can grant relief, the jurisdiction of the civil courts is ousted. But for those reliefs that cannot be granted by the CCI, the jurisdiction of the civil court is not ousted.”

Previously, Google mandated all application developers to utilize its Google Play Billing System (GPBS) for all financial transactions, encompassing paid application downloads and in-app acquisitions. Developers were subjected to a commission ranging between 15 – 30% for the services facilitated by Google.

Google’s updated billing framework permits users to opt for an “alternative billing” option apart from GPBS. It enables application developers to utilize 3rd-party billing systems while imposing a service charge ranging from 11 – 26%.
Matrimony and other application developers have opposed their opposition to this fee within the purview of the High Court.

The Court will hear further arguments on August 23.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Rajasthan HC Quashes SC/ST Case Against Actress Shilpa Shetty

The Rajasthan High Court on Thursday quashed a complaint filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of…

19 hours ago

Allahabad HC Turns Down Appeal Seeking Appointment Of Receiver For Jaigurudev Sanstha

The Allahabad High Court on Thursday has dismissed an appeal filed by the Jaigurudev Dharma…

19 hours ago

Shivaji Statue Collapse Case: Bombay HC Grants Bail To Consultant Chetan Patil

The Bombay High Court granted bail to consultant Chetan Patil on Thursday in connection with…

20 hours ago

Excise Policy Case: Delhi HC Refuses To Stay Trial Against Arvind Kejriwal

The Delhi High Court on Thursday declined to stay the trial proceedings against former Delhi…

20 hours ago

AP Assembly Passes Resolution To Set Up HC Bench In Kurnool

The Andhra Pradesh Assembly on Thursday passed a resolution to establish a permanent High Court…

21 hours ago

Lesbian Couple Desiring Child Gets Bail In Kidnapping Of Minor Girl

The Bombay High Court on Thursday granted bail to a lesbian couple arrested for allegedly…

21 hours ago