National

No “constitutional fraud” in repealing the provision giving special status to Jammu & Kashmir, Centre tell SC

The Centre government on Thursday asserted the top court that there was no “constitutional fraud” in annulling the provision that accorded special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir.

Appearing for the Centre government Attorney General R Venkataramani said it was necessary to abrogate Article 370 and there were no infirmities in the process adopted. There was no constitutional fraud, as alleged, in abrogation of the provision. AG Venkataramani, further argued that “Due process was followed. There was no wrongdoing and there was no constitutional fraud as alleged by the other side. The step was necessary to be taken. Their argument is flawed and inconceivable,” Venkataramani told the bench, also comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai and Surya Kant.

The five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, told Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who appeared for the Centre, that eventually he will have to explain how the word “constituent assembly” which existed in clause 2 of Article 370 was replaced with the word “legislative assembly” August 5, 2019, the day the provisions of Article 370 were done away with.

CJI Chandrachud told Mehta “You will have to argue how it was not a constituent assembly but a legislative assembly in its original form. You will have to answer how it will square up with clause 2 of Article 370 which specifically says the constituent assembly formed for the purpose of framing the constitution of that state….because, there is a textual answer which may militate against your line of approach,”

The solicitor general replied that he would try to satisfy the conscience of the court and explain the procedure adopted and how it was constitutionally permissible.
The hearing will resume on August 28.

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

10 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

10 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

10 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

11 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

11 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

11 hours ago