National

Parliamentary Panel Advocates Cautious Approach to Implementing Technology in Proposed Criminal Laws

A parliamentary committee, which scrutinized three proposed criminal laws, has commended the initiative to enhance technology usage in legal proceedings. However, the panel, led by BJP MP Brij Lal, emphasized that the adoption of electronic means for communication and trials should proceed only after establishing robust safeguards.

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs acknowledged the positive step of enabling online or electronic First Information Report (FIR) registration but suggested that it should be allowed only through modes specified by the state.

The committee noted the provision in the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS-2023) for trials in electronic mode, emphasizing the increased utilization of technology in legal proceedings. Clause 532 of the BNSS-2023 allows for electronic mode trials using devices like mobiles, computers, or telephones.

While recognizing the advantages of increased technological integration, the committee raised concerns about potential manipulation and misuse. It highlighted worries about data security and unauthorized access in the collection and storage of electronic evidence.

The committee recommended that the adoption of electronic means for communication and trials proceed only after establishing robust safeguards for secure usage and authentication of electronically available data. This, the committee asserted, would ensure the integrity of the justice system.

Addressing the challenges posed by allowing electronic communication for FIR registration, the committee stated that it could create logistical and technical difficulties for law enforcement. It also expressed concerns about tracking all filed FIRs, especially if forms like sending an SMS to a police officer are considered providing information under Clause 173 of the BNSS-2023.

The committee suggested adding a proviso to Clause 266 of the BNSS-2023 to facilitate the recording of defense evidence through audio-video electronic mode. However, it recommended that such recording be allowed only at select government places to prevent tutoring or intimidation of witnesses.

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS-2023) bill, introduced in the Lok Sabha on August 11, along with the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS-2023) and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA-2023) bills, aims to replace the Code of Criminal Procedure Act, 1898, the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, respectively.

Nunnem Gangte

Share
Published by
Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

14 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

14 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

14 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

15 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

15 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

15 hours ago