National

PC Act Can be Invoked against Bank Officials- Telangana High Court

Recently, the Telangana High Court granted permission to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to prosecute Ramesh Gelli, the former Chairman and Managing Director (CMD) of Global Trust Bank, and Sridhar Subasri, the Executive Director (ED), under the Prevention of Corruption (PC) Act. Justice EV Venugopal overturned a 2010 decision by a special CBI court that had discharged the accused on the grounds that they were not public servants.

The court observed that according to Sector 46A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, the Managing Director and Executive Director of a bank licensed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) are considered public servants. It also referenced a Supreme Court ruling affirming Gelli and Subasri’s status as public servants, thus subjecting them to prosecution under the PC Act.

Justice Venugopal stated, “Given the Supreme Court’s determination that the respondents are indeed public servants and fall under the PC Act’s jurisdiction, this Court sees no reason to deviate from that conclusion.”

The case, registered in 2005, accused Gelli and Subasri of colluding with others to defraud the bank and cause losses amounting to ₹10.25 crore. Although the accused were charged in 2008, the trial court discharged them in 2010, citing their ineligibility for prosecution under the PC Act. The CBI contested this decision, arguing that Gelli and Subasri met the criteria of public servants under the PC Act due to Section 46-A of the Banking Regulation Act.

Justice Venugopal concurred with the CBI’s arguments, stating that the allegations against Gelli and Subasri revolved around the misuse of their official positions involving public funds, rendering them liable for prosecution under the PC Act.

Additionally, the court noted that the Bombay High Court ruling, which the trial court had relied upon to assert that Gelli and Subasri were not public servants, was overturned by the Supreme Court in 2016.

Consequently, the High Court upheld the CBI’s petitions and overturned the trial court’s decision. Anandi, serving as Special Public Prosecutor, represented the CBI, while Senior Counsel L Ravi Chander, Advocate E Umamaheshwar Rao, and C Sharan Reddy represented the accused.

Legally Speaking Desk

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago