National

PC Act Can be Invoked against Bank Officials- Telangana High Court

Recently, the Telangana High Court granted permission to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to prosecute Ramesh Gelli, the former Chairman and Managing Director (CMD) of Global Trust Bank, and Sridhar Subasri, the Executive Director (ED), under the Prevention of Corruption (PC) Act. Justice EV Venugopal overturned a 2010 decision by a special CBI court that had discharged the accused on the grounds that they were not public servants.

The court observed that according to Sector 46A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, the Managing Director and Executive Director of a bank licensed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) are considered public servants. It also referenced a Supreme Court ruling affirming Gelli and Subasri’s status as public servants, thus subjecting them to prosecution under the PC Act.

Justice Venugopal stated, “Given the Supreme Court’s determination that the respondents are indeed public servants and fall under the PC Act’s jurisdiction, this Court sees no reason to deviate from that conclusion.”

The case, registered in 2005, accused Gelli and Subasri of colluding with others to defraud the bank and cause losses amounting to ₹10.25 crore. Although the accused were charged in 2008, the trial court discharged them in 2010, citing their ineligibility for prosecution under the PC Act. The CBI contested this decision, arguing that Gelli and Subasri met the criteria of public servants under the PC Act due to Section 46-A of the Banking Regulation Act.

Justice Venugopal concurred with the CBI’s arguments, stating that the allegations against Gelli and Subasri revolved around the misuse of their official positions involving public funds, rendering them liable for prosecution under the PC Act.

Additionally, the court noted that the Bombay High Court ruling, which the trial court had relied upon to assert that Gelli and Subasri were not public servants, was overturned by the Supreme Court in 2016.

Consequently, the High Court upheld the CBI’s petitions and overturned the trial court’s decision. Anandi, serving as Special Public Prosecutor, represented the CBI, while Senior Counsel L Ravi Chander, Advocate E Umamaheshwar Rao, and C Sharan Reddy represented the accused.

Legally Speaking Desk

Share
Published by
Legally Speaking Desk

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

14 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

14 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

14 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

15 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

15 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

15 hours ago