The Supreme Court on Wednesday posted for hearing on October 3 a plea of former Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu seeking to quash the FIR registered against him in the skill development scam case.
The matter was listed before a bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and SVN Bhatti.
However, as the matter came up for hearing, Justice Batti recused from hearing the case.
Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, appearing for Naidu, then mentioned the plea before a bench headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud for an urgent listing.
Luthra while mentioning the matter stated that Naidu was picked up illegally on September 8 Naidu and he has been detained.
The senior advocate stated the probe agency is pressing for 15 days of police custody before the trial court, and let them not press the police custody.
CJI told Luthra that “it will not restrain the trial judge from dealing with the application.”
The bench added, “We will keep it on the October 3.”
Luthra further stated that the probe agency is roping Naidu in FIR after FIR and this kind of regime revenge cannot happen.
He stated, “They are roping him in FIR after FIR. He is a Z plus arrestee. 2024 Elections are there and they are trying to save themselves from embarrassment. This kind of regime revenge cannot happen.”
Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar, representing the Andhra Pradesh government stated that “this is about 3300 crores. GST, authorities found there was siphoning off money and then a case was filed by CBI. Files started disappearing thereafter.”
Naidu approached the Supreme Court against the High Court order which declined to quash the FIR last week.
Furthermore, he sought the quashing of the FIR registered by AP-CID in the alleged Rs 371 crore skill development scam on the ground that the police didn’t obtain prior sanction from the Governor as mandated under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
In his plea, Naidu contended that the Andhra Pradesh High Court rejected his petition by ignoring his pleading that under Section 17A of the PC Act, which came into force on July 26, 2018, no FIR against a public servant could be registered without prior sanction of the appropriate authority.
Previously on December 9, 2021, FIR against Naidu was registered, and he was added as accused number 37 in the case on September 7, 2023. The plea stated, Section 17 A of the PC Act was not complied with as “no permission was obtained from the competent authority.”
As Naidu was the Chief Minister at the time of the commission of the alleged offence relating to the skill development scam, the competent authority would have been the Governor of the state.
Naidu, presently the Leader of the Opposition, the national president of the Telugu Desam Party, called the action against him as “an orchestrated campaign of regime revenge and to derail the largest opposition in the state, the Telugu Desam Party”.
It added, “The extent of the political vendetta is further demonstrated from the belated application for grant of police custody on September 11, 2023, which names the political opponent i.e. the TDP and also the petitioner’s family, which is being targeted to crush all opposition to the party in power in the State with elections coming near in 2024.”
The appeal stated, this motivated campaign of harassment has been allowed to continue by the courts unabated despite patent illegality in the FIR.
The Rajasthan High Court on Thursday quashed a complaint filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of…
The Allahabad High Court on Thursday has dismissed an appeal filed by the Jaigurudev Dharma…
The Bombay High Court granted bail to consultant Chetan Patil on Thursday in connection with…
The Delhi High Court on Thursday declined to stay the trial proceedings against former Delhi…
The Andhra Pradesh Assembly on Thursday passed a resolution to establish a permanent High Court…
The Bombay High Court on Thursday granted bail to a lesbian couple arrested for allegedly…