National

Sebi Proposes Broader Scope of UPSI

To improve transparency in market disclosures, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) is proposing an expansion of the definition of Unpublished Price Sensitive Information (UPSI).

The regulator aims to include proposed fundraising activities, corporate restructuring plans, and one-time bank settlements under UPSI, in a bid to enhance regulatory clarity and consistency.

In its consultation paper, Sebi suggests that only certain types of agreements—those involving shareholder arrangements, joint ventures, and family settlements—should be considered price-sensitive if they affect the management and control of a firm and are known to the company.

Additionally, significant developments in corporate insolvency proceedings, such as the initiation or approval of resolution plans by tribunals, should be disclosed as potentially price-sensitive information.

The proposal also extends to forensic audits launched or concluded in cases of fund misappropriation or financial misstatements, which would need to be disclosed as price-sensitive if they have the potential to affect market behavior.

Currently, fundraising proposals are not included in the definition of UPSI, but Sebi is now suggesting that any proposed fundraising activities be disclosed as potentially price-sensitive. Similarly, significant financial restructurings, such as restructuring plans or one-time bank settlements, should be classified as UPSI.

Further recommendations include considering actions taken by regulatory or judicial bodies against a company or its key personnel—if these involve significant enforcement, fines, penalties, or sanctions—as price-sensitive. Sebi also advocates for the disclosure of outcomes from major litigations or disputes that could impact the company’s operations or financial standing.

The regulator proposes that major contracts or orders awarded to a company, or significant amendments or terminations to such agreements outside normal business activities, be disclosed as UPSI due to their potential effect on financial performance.

Additionally, any changes to essential licenses or approvals, including their granting, withdrawal, or suspension, should also be disclosed, as these could significantly impact company operations.

Sebi has invited public comments on these proposals by November 30, as it seeks to refine its regulations to better align with market transparency needs.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

SC Directs Assam Tea Corp To Submit Asset List Amid Financial Struggles

The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the chairman of Assam Tea Corporation Limited to provide…

4 hours ago

SC Stays HC Order For CBI Probe Into Jharkhand Assembly Appointment Irregularities

The Supreme Court on Thursday has stayed a Jharkhand High Court ruling that ordered the…

4 hours ago

SC Denies Bail To Odisha BJP Leader In Woman Police Assault Case

The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected the anticipatory bail plea of Odisha MLA and BJP…

4 hours ago

SC Delays Hearing On PIL Over Contracts To Arunachal CM’s Family

The Supreme Court on Thursday deferred the hearing on a PIL seeking a CBI or…

5 hours ago

SC Rejects PIL To Ban WhatsApp For Failure To Comply With Govt Regulations

The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed a PIL that sought to ban WhatsApp's operations in…

6 hours ago

Bombay HC Declines ‘Matqa Queen’ Jaya Chheda’s Plea To Dismiss Gambling Cases

The Bombay High Court has rejected Jaya Chheda's, also known as the "matka queen," request…

7 hours ago