Other Courts

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of Badal Singh, who was killed by a mob during the 1984 anti-Sikh riots at Gurudwara Pul Bangash.

Badal Singh, a ragi at the Gurudwara, was one of three people killed during the violence on November 1, 1984. Lakhvinder Kaur broke down while delivering her statement.

Special CBI Link Judge Vishal Gogne presided over the hearing, recording Kaur’s evidence. The court has scheduled the next session for October 15, during which Kaur will be cross-examined by Congress leader Jagdish Tytler’s counsel.

In her deposition, Kaur recounted being informed by granthi Surender Singh that her husband was killed by a mob incited by Tytler. She stated, “Surender Singh told me that Tytler was telling the rioters, ‘Sikho ko mar do, ujad do, Gurudwara ko aag laga do’ (Kill the Sikhs, destroy them, and set fire to the Gurudwara).”

Kaur recalled that her marriage to Badal Singh took place in 1981, and that he had dropped her off at her village in Muzaffarnagar two days before the riots. Singh had returned to Delhi, where he was killed. Kaur learned of her husband’s death five days later and traveled to Delhi with her father-in-law. At the time, her elder daughter was just ten months old, and she was pregnant with her second child, who was born after Badal Singh’s death.

In 2008, during court proceedings related to the 1984 anti-Sikh riots at Karkardooma Court, Kaur met Surender Singh, who identified her as Badal Singh’s widow. Singh recounted witnessing her husband exiting the Gurudwara, only to be attacked by the mob, who stabbed him to death with a kirpan. Singh also stated that Jagdish Tytler was present at the scene, inciting the mob to commit violence against Sikhs and the Gurudwara.

According to Singh, after killing Badal Singh, the mob placed his body in a cart and burned it with tyres. Following this account, Kaur contacted her lawyer, who filed an application in Karkardooma Court for an investigation into the case. Other victims of the riots corroborated the information Kaur provided, which was included in the application.

Tytler’s counsel opposed Kaur’s statement, arguing that it was based on hearsay and, therefore, not admissible as evidence. However, the Public Prosecutor for the CBI responded that the admissibility of the testimony would be considered after the conclusion of all evidence. Despite the defense’s objection to the recording of the evidence, the court allowed it to proceed.

This testimony comes after the court framed charges against Congress leader Jagdish Tytler on September 13, 2023, in connection with his alleged involvement in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.

Read More: Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, States High Court, International

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Supreme Court Says “Marriage Is Relationship Built On Mutual Trust, Companionship”

The Supreme Court has upheld a decision by the Madras High Court granting a divorce…

1 day ago

Delhi HC Grants Anticipatory Bail To Lawyer In Brother’s Criminal Case

The Delhi High Court has granted transit anticipatory bail to a lawyer whose brother is…

1 day ago

Justice Madan B Lokur Appointed As Chairperson of UN Internal Justice Council

Former Supreme Court Justice Madan B Lokur has been recently named the chairperson of the…

1 day ago

Karnataka High Court Directs NLSIU To Implement 0.5% Reservation For Transgender Persons

The Karnataka High Court has recently directed the National Law School of India University (NLSIU)…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Directs UP Vigilance To Investigate Himalayan Cooperative Housing Land Issue

The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Vigilance Department to investigate the Himalayan…

2 days ago

Allahabad HC Grants Stay On Mohammed Zubair’s Arrest In Religious Enmity Case

The Allahabad High Court on Friday issued an order staying the arrest of Mohammed Zubair,…

2 days ago