2008 Malegaon Bomb Blast: SC Rejects Discharge Plea Of Lt. Colonel Prasad Purohit

The Supreme Court recently dismissed an appeal filed by Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit seeking discharge in connection with the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast, which killed six people and injured more than 100.

A bench comprising Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Manoj Misra refused to intervene in the Bombay High Court’s dismissal of Purohit’s plea.

However, the apex court, clarified that the trial court should not be influenced by observations in the High Court’s order.

” … the Special Leave Petition is not entertained. However, as we are informed that the trial against the petitioner is continuing, the observation made in the impugned order for the purpose of examining the issue of sanction should not prejudice either the prosecution or the defence, in the proceedings before the trial court. With the above order, the Special Leave Petition stands dismissed,” the order stated.

Purohit, a serving army officer, was charged in the 2008 Malegaon blasts after it was discovered that he had attended meetings of a group called Abhinav Bharat, where the conspiracy for the blasts was hatched.

The Lieutenant Colonel initially sought discharge in a lower court, claiming that the Central Government had not obtained proper authorization to prosecute a serving army officer.

He then went to the High Court after his appeal was denied.

Purohit sought discharge on two grounds:

First, he had been attending meetings despite informing his superiors about them. He claimed to have been on duty at the time.

Secondly, as he was a serving officer, the prosecution agency was required to obtain sanction from the appropriate authorities, which they had not done.

On January 2, a division bench of Justice AS Gadkari and Justice PD Naik ruled that Purohit was not on duty when he attended Abhinav Bharat meetings and dismissed the discharge plea.

The Lieutenant Colonel then filed the current appeal before the apex court.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

12 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

12 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

12 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

13 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

13 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

13 hours ago