Categories: Other Courts

Aarey Metro Shed: Bombay HC Directed Petitioners To Approach Apex Court

The Bombay High Court recently suggested that petitioners who filed PILs challenging the removal of 177 trees at Aarey for the Mumbai Metro Rail project’s car depot should approach the Supreme Court.

A division bench of Acting Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice Sandeep Marne noted that the Supreme Court had passed an order in November 2022 in a suo motu petition, which was still pending.

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) Tree Authority had also issued a public notice seeking concerns, and the bench advised the petitioner, activist Zoru Bhathena, to raise objections with the Tree Authority.

Bhathena filed a public interest litigation (PIL) stating that the Tree Authority’s notification breached a Supreme Court judgement authorising the felling of 84 trees for the project.

The court suggested that Bhathena could approach the Supreme Court for clarification, as the interpretation of the order was at the crux of the issue. However, the court could not intervene in a matter sub judice before the Supreme Court.

The division bench dismissed the PIL, noting that it was up to the parties involved to take the necessary steps.

During previous sessions, the Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Corporation Limited (MMRCL) expressed concerns to the court about the challenges caused by delays in the construction of the Aarey vehicle depot due to legal cases.

The MMRCL stated that as a result of the delays, additional trees may need to be cut down for the construction of the automobile depot because numerous plants and saplings had developed into trees during the pending legal proceedings.

Appearing for MMRCL, Senior advocate Ashutosh Kumbhakoni informed the bench that the initial application was for the felling of 84 trees, but that the area now has a larger number of trees that have grown on it due to the passage of time.

According to the PIL, the notification was based on an application made by MMRCL following a Supreme Court judgement in November 2022 that allowed the corporation to request the destruction of only 84 trees for the project.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Gulmarg Fashion Show: Srinagar Court To Hear Case Against Organizers On April 8

A Srinagar court has scheduled a hearing for April 8, 2025, in connection with the…

1 day ago

Gold Smuggling Case: Kannada Actress Ranya Rao Moves Sessions Court For Bail

Kannada actress Ranya Rao, arrested last week in connection with a gold smuggling case, has…

1 day ago

“Advocates Can appear In Confiscation Proceedings Under Forest Act”: MP High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that advocates can represent clients in confiscation cases under…

1 day ago

Cement Prices Are Likely To Increase Because Of New Mineral Tax By States: Report

Cement prices across various states are expected to increase following a Supreme Court ruling that…

1 day ago

“Plaint Against Teacher By Parent, Student: First Enquiry, Then Arrest”: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has laid down new guidelines to protect educators from hasty arrests…

2 days ago

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

3 days ago