Categories: Other Courts

Aarey Metro Shed: Bombay HC Directed Petitioners To Approach Apex Court

The Bombay High Court recently suggested that petitioners who filed PILs challenging the removal of 177 trees at Aarey for the Mumbai Metro Rail project’s car depot should approach the Supreme Court.

A division bench of Acting Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice Sandeep Marne noted that the Supreme Court had passed an order in November 2022 in a suo motu petition, which was still pending.

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) Tree Authority had also issued a public notice seeking concerns, and the bench advised the petitioner, activist Zoru Bhathena, to raise objections with the Tree Authority.

Bhathena filed a public interest litigation (PIL) stating that the Tree Authority’s notification breached a Supreme Court judgement authorising the felling of 84 trees for the project.

The court suggested that Bhathena could approach the Supreme Court for clarification, as the interpretation of the order was at the crux of the issue. However, the court could not intervene in a matter sub judice before the Supreme Court.

The division bench dismissed the PIL, noting that it was up to the parties involved to take the necessary steps.

During previous sessions, the Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Corporation Limited (MMRCL) expressed concerns to the court about the challenges caused by delays in the construction of the Aarey vehicle depot due to legal cases.

The MMRCL stated that as a result of the delays, additional trees may need to be cut down for the construction of the automobile depot because numerous plants and saplings had developed into trees during the pending legal proceedings.

Appearing for MMRCL, Senior advocate Ashutosh Kumbhakoni informed the bench that the initial application was for the felling of 84 trees, but that the area now has a larger number of trees that have grown on it due to the passage of time.

According to the PIL, the notification was based on an application made by MMRCL following a Supreme Court judgement in November 2022 that allowed the corporation to request the destruction of only 84 trees for the project.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

Punjab & Haryana HC Notice To Jindal Law School Over AI-Generated Exam Claims

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…

9 hours ago

ED Files Money Laundering Complaint Against Charanjit Singh Bajaj, 4 Others

The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…

9 hours ago

Pune Porsche Case: SC Rejects Anticipatory Bail To Father Of Minor Driver’s Friend

The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…

10 hours ago

SC Dumps Plea Against Quashing LOC For Sushant Singh Rajput’s Ex-House Help

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…

11 hours ago

Rape Case: SC Issues Notice On Ex-Army Officer’s Plea For Quashing Charge sheet

The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…

11 hours ago

Chhattisgarh NAN Scam: FIR Against 2 Retired IAS Officers, Former AG

The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…

12 hours ago