Allahabad HC Quashes Complaint Against SP MLA For His Alleged Statement Against Goddess Gauri & Lord Ganesha

The Allahabad High Court recently dismissed a criminal complaint filed against Samajwadi Party MLA Swami Prasad Maurya in 2014 for allegedly saying, “Goddess Gauri or Lord Ganesha should not be worshipped during weddings.”

A single-judge Justice Subhash Vidyarthi also quashed the order of the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sultanpur passed in November 2014 summoning Maurya to face charges under Section 295A IPC.

The bench ordered thus while holding that the order taking cognizance of the complaint and summoning Maurya to face trial for commission of an offence under Section 295A IPC without obtaining the mandatory sanction of the Government as provided by Section 196 CrPC was not legal.

The proceedings against Maurya were initiated in response to a complaint alleging that on September 22, 2014, a news item about Maurya’s alleged statement was published in a Hindi daily newspaper, infringing on the complainant’s religious sentiments.

The complaint claimed that Maurya had knowingly offended the religious sentiments of Hindus. After taking statements under Sections 200 and 202 of the CrPC, the trial Court issued an order summoning Maurya to stand trial for violating Section 295-A of the IPC.

Maurya challenged the summoning order, arguing that the Court took cognizance of the complaint without the prior sanction of the Government required under Section 196 CrPC, and thus the summoning order is invalid in law.

Though Jayant Singh Tomar, for the state government, raised a preliminary objection that the ground raised by Maurya before the HC was not raised before the trial Court or the revisional Court, the bench stated that a new plea raising a pure question of law can be raised at any stage, as can a plea relating to the Court’s jurisdiction.

In light of this, finding cognizance of the complaint and order summoning Maurya to be bad in law, the bench allowed the plea and quashed the summoning order passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Sultanpur and the entire proceedings of the complaint.

Nunnem Gangte

Recent Posts

SC Ruling Paves Way For Visually Impaired Judges; Yavnika Shares Her Experience

Supreme Court recently opened up the doors for visually impaired candidates in judiciary by striking…

1 day ago

Supreme Court To Hear Plea To Debar Poll Candidates Charged For Serious Offences On Mar 18

The Supreme Court is set to hear a plea on March 18 that seeks to…

1 day ago

Bombay HC Grants Pension Benefits To Former Judge Pushpa Ganediwala

The Bombay High Court has ruled in favor of former Additional Judge Pushpa Ganediwala, granting…

1 day ago

Bombay HC Sets Aside Complaint Against Kailash Kher For Hurting Religious Feelings

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a complaint against singer Kailash Kher, which alleged that…

1 day ago

Uttarakhand HC Stays Proposed Felling Of 3,300 Trees In Shivalik Elephant Reserve

The Uttarakhand High Court has put a temporary halt on the felling of 3,300 trees…

1 day ago

“Notify Posts For Special Education Teachers By March 28”: Supreme Court To States, UTs

The Supreme Court has directed all states and Union Territories to notify the sanctioned posts…

1 day ago