Allahabad HC Refuses Bail To Man Inciting Anti-India Sentiments

The Allahabad High Court has recently rejected the bail plea of a Lashkar-e-Toiba associate, who was accused of waging war against the country and promoting acquisition of arms via various WhatsApp groups.

Justice Pankaj Bhatia dismissed the bail application filed by Inamul Haq, who stands implicated in a First Information Report registered at the Deoband police station in Saharanpur.

The FIR pertains to offenses specified under Section 121-A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which pertains to the act of waging war against the government of India, and Section 153-A of the IPC, which addresses the promotion of hostility between distinct religious or communal groups.

Subsequent to the recovery of specific materials, it emerged that Haq purportedly established a WhatsApp group that functioned as a platform for disseminating ‘jihadi’ literature.

Inamul Haq acknowledged his affiliation with Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) and his role as the administrator of the mentioned WhatsApp group. The group counted 181 members, encompassing 170 individuals from Pakistan, three from Afghanistan, and one each from Malaysia and Bangladesh.

Additionally, the applicant was associated with another similar group, wherein endeavors were made to allure individuals into joining the aforementioned group.

After hearing parties concerned last week, the court observed, “In the present case, from the allegations levelled against the applicant and the FIR that the applicant was admin of two WhatsApp groups comprising mainly foreign citizens, and the said group was allegedly promoting the acquisition of arms and promoting the group on the basis of religious prejudices.”

The court added, “Although, the right to practice and propagate religion is guaranteed under Article 19, however, from the nature of allegations levelled in the FIR, considering the gravity of the allegation, no case for grant of bail is made out, as such. The bail application is liable to be rejected.”

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Defamation Case: “Raut Didn’t Take Care & Caution, Caused Complainant Agony”- Mumbai Court

A Mumbai court has convicted Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut in a defamation case…

16 hours ago

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Tytler Case: Delhi Court Records Statement Of Lakhvinder Kaur

The Rouse Avenue court on Thursday recorded the emotional testimony of Lakhvinder Kaur, widow of…

16 hours ago

Satyendar Jain Says Probe In Money Laundering Case Incomplete, Seeks Default Bail In Delhi HC

Former minister Satyendar Jain, currently in jail, urged the Delhi High Court on Thursday to…

16 hours ago

Tirupati Laddus Row: SC To Hear Pleas Seeking Court-Monitored Probe On Oct 4

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of petitions on Friday regarding the…

17 hours ago

SC Scraps Caste-Based Discrimination In Prisons, Terms It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a groundbreaking judgment on Thursday, declaring caste-based discrimination in…

17 hours ago

Mahadev Betting App Case: SC Gives Bail To Chhattisgarh Businessman

The Supreme Court on Thursday has granted bail to Chhattisgarh businessman Sunil Dammani, who was…

17 hours ago