Allahabad HC Refuses Bail To Man Inciting Anti-India Sentiments

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Allahabad High Court has recently rejected the bail plea of a Lashkar-e-Toiba associate, who was accused of waging war against the country and promoting acquisition of arms via various WhatsApp groups.

Justice Pankaj Bhatia dismissed the bail application filed by Inamul Haq, who stands implicated in a First Information Report registered at the Deoband police station in Saharanpur.

The FIR pertains to offenses specified under Section 121-A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which pertains to the act of waging war against the government of India, and Section 153-A of the IPC, which addresses the promotion of hostility between distinct religious or communal groups.

Subsequent to the recovery of specific materials, it emerged that Haq purportedly established a WhatsApp group that functioned as a platform for disseminating ‘jihadi’ literature.

Inamul Haq acknowledged his affiliation with Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) and his role as the administrator of the mentioned WhatsApp group. The group counted 181 members, encompassing 170 individuals from Pakistan, three from Afghanistan, and one each from Malaysia and Bangladesh.

Additionally, the applicant was associated with another similar group, wherein endeavors were made to allure individuals into joining the aforementioned group.

After hearing parties concerned last week, the court observed, “In the present case, from the allegations levelled against the applicant and the FIR that the applicant was admin of two WhatsApp groups comprising mainly foreign citizens, and the said group was allegedly promoting the acquisition of arms and promoting the group on the basis of religious prejudices.”

The court added, “Although, the right to practice and propagate religion is guaranteed under Article 19, however, from the nature of allegations levelled in the FIR, considering the gravity of the allegation, no case for grant of bail is made out, as such. The bail application is liable to be rejected.”

Meera Verma

Recent Posts

Nitish Katara Murder: Supreme Court Seeks UP Govt Response On Vikas Yadav’s Interim Bail Plea

The Supreme Court on Wednesday has sought the Uttar Pradesh government's response on the interim…

9 hours ago

Ranya Rao Gold Smuggling Case: 3rd Accused Sent To 14-Day Of Judicial Custody

The Special Court for Economic Offenses on Wednesday has sent Sahil Jain, the 3rd accused…

9 hours ago

Bombing Case: Calcutta HC Grants Temporary Protection To BJP Leader Arjun Singh

The Calcutta High Court on Wednesday verbally directed the police not to take any coercive…

9 hours ago

MCOCA Case: Delhi HC Sets April 9 To Hear Bail Plea Of Naresh Balyan

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday scheduled the bail plea hearing of former Aam Aadmi…

10 hours ago

‘Laapataa Ladies’ Faces Plagiarism Allegations; Netizens Claim It Was Copied From Arabic Film ‘Burqa City’

Kiran Rao’s critically acclaimed film Laapataa Ladies, produced by Aamir Khan, has sparked a fresh…

10 hours ago

RSS Leader Murder Case: Kerala HC Grants Bail To 10 PFI Members Accused

The Kerala High Court on wednesday granted bail to 10 members of the now-banned Popular…

11 hours ago