Categories: Other Courts

Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Granted Merely Because Custodial Interrogation Is Not Required

The Supreme Court in the case X vs Arun Kumar CK observed that an anticipatory bail cannot be granted merely because custodial interrogation is not required.
The bench comprising of Justice Surya Kant and Justice JB Pardiwala observed that the first and foremost thing that the court hearing an anticipatory bail application should consider is the prima facie case being put up against the accused.
In the present case, the court was considering an appeal filed by mother of a victim in a POCSO case against the Kerala High Court order of granted anticipatory bail to the accused.
It had been noted by the Court that in many anticipatory bail matters, one common argument is being canvassed that no custodial interrogation is required and, moreover, anticipatory bail may be granted.
The bench stated that these allegations appear to be serious misconception of law that if no case for custodial interrogation is made out by the prosecution, then that alone would be a good ground for granting of an anticipatory bail. However, custodial interrogation can be one of the relevant aspects to be considered along with other grounds while deciding an application seeking anticipatory bail and there may be many cases in which the custodial interrogation of the accused may not be required, but the same does not mean that the prima facie case against the accused should be ignored or overlooked and anticipatory bail should be granted to him.
Further, it was explained by the court that the first and foremost thing is that the court hearing an anticipatory bail application should consider is the prima facie case put up against the accused. The nature of the offence committed should be looked into along with the severity of the punishment. One of the grounds can be the custodial interrogation to decline custodial interrogation. Thereafter, even if the custodial interrogation is not required or necessitated, by itself, cannot be a ground to grant anticipatory bail.

The post Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Granted Merely Because Custodial Interrogation Is Not Required appeared first on The Daily Guardian.

- -

Recent Posts

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay HC To Protect His Personality Rights

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar has approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection of his personality…

2 months ago

Bribery Case: CBI Arrests NHIDCL Executive Director

The Central Bureau of Investigation on Wednesday arrested the Executive Director and Regional Officer of…

2 months ago

Supreme Court Issues Slew Of Directions On Green Crackers Issue

The Supreme Court on Wednesday laid down detailed interim guidelines permitting the sale and use…

2 months ago

INX Media Case: Delhi HC Relaxes Travel Restrictions On Karti Chidambaram

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday relaxed the travel restrictions placed on Congress MP Karti…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Rules Lawyers’ Offices Not Commercial Establishments; Quashes NDMC Case Against Advocate

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday clarified that the professional office of a lawyer does…

2 months ago

Delhi HC Allows Actor Rajpal Yadav To Travel To Dubai For Diwali Event

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday permitted actor Rajpal Yadav to travel to Dubai to…

2 months ago