The U.S. Appellate Court for the Federal Circuit has recently rejected Apple’s argument that it had priority over trumpeter Charlie Bertini’s “Apple Jazz” trademark rights based on its ownership of an earlier trademark from the Beatles’ musicApple Corps Ltd.
Therefore, the court allowed Bertini to block Apple’s bid for a federal Apple Music trademark covering live performances, one of several trademarks used by Apple to seek secure.
Apple launched its streaming service in the year 2015 and applied the same year for the federal “Apple Music” trademark covering several categories of music and entertainment services.
Bertini opposed the application while arguing the name which would cause confusion with the “Apple Jazz” branding he used since 1985 to advertise concerts. But a US Trademark Office tribunal ruled for Apple in 2021, finding its earlier rights to the name based on a 1968 “Apple” trademark for sound recordings it purchased from Apple Corps in 2007.
A unanimous Federal Circuit panel reversed the decision to dismiss Bertini’s opposition. It stated that Apple could not “tack” its trademark rights for live performances to the Apple Corps trademark for sound recordings.
Therefore, the court stated that “Tacking a mark for one good or service doesn’t grant priority for every other good or service in the trademark application.”
The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday has issued a notice to Jindal Global…
The ED on Tuesday has filed a Prosecution Complaint before the Special Court in Mohali…
The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied bail to Arunkumar Devnath Singh, whose son is a…
The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the Centre's appeal against a Bombay High Court order…
The Supreme Court on Tuesday has agreed to review a plea from retired Army Captain…
The Chhattisgarh Anti-Corruption Bureau on Tuesday has registered a case against 2 retired IAS officers…