Bangalore Consumer Forum Fines NHAI & Toll Booth Company For Charging Commuter ₹10 Excess Toll Fee

FacebookFacebookTwitterTwitterEmailEmailWhatsAppWhatsAppLinkedInLinkedInShareShare

The Bangalore District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission recently ordered the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and JAS Toll Road Company Limited to pay a commuter ₹5,000 in compensation after he was charged ₹10 excess toll fee.

The Commission’s President, B Narayanappa, and members Jyothi N and Sharavathi SM remarked that, despite collecting an excessive fee and the complainant running from pillar to post to correct the error, the NHAI and the toll firm showed no intention of resolving the complaint.

The complainant moved before the Commission, stating that he was charged ₹40 instead of ₹35 as a toll for a highway in Karnataka on two occasions.

Following the first instance, he issued a legal notice to the toll firm to correct the error. The corporation, however, did not correct the problem and repeated the excess collection a few months later. As a result, he approached the Commission.

The Commission noted that the tolls were clearly ₹35 and not ₹40. As a result, it decided that the NHAI and the company provided poor service.

It further stated that such errors do occur and that customers do not expect perfection.

“All they expect is for the responsible authority to acknowledge their redress and correct the error within a reasonable time frame,” the order stated.

The Commission concluded that defective service was evident because the NHAI and the firm did not take steps to address the complainant’s grievance.

As a result, the Commission ordered them to pay the complainant ₹10, as well as ₹5,000 in compensation for creating mental anguish and physical hardship, and another ₹3,000 in litigation fees.

Isha Das

Recent Posts

SC Upholds Disqualification Of Himachal Pradesh Pradhan For Concealing Criminal Case

The Supreme Court has upheld the Himachal Pradesh High Court's decision that candidates contesting panchayat…

8 hours ago

Delhi Court To Hear Satyender Jain’s Defamation Case; Confirms Jurisdiction

The Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court on Saturday has ruled that it has jurisdiction to proceed…

8 hours ago

Copyright Case: Delhi HC Directs A R Rahman, Ponniyin Selvan 2 Makers To Deposit Rs 2 cr

The Delhi High Court has determined that “Veera Raja Veera,” featured in the film Ponniyin…

8 hours ago

Road Rage Case: Karnataka HC Obstructs IAF Officer From Police Action

The Karnataka High Court has barred Bengaluru police from arresting Indian Air Force (IAF) Wing…

8 hours ago

Defamation Case: Pune Court Summons Rahul Gandhi Over His Remarks On Savarkar

A Pune court has called Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to appear on May 9 in…

9 hours ago

Madras HC Restores 2 Disproportionate Assets Cases Against Minister Panneerselvam

The Madras High Court has revived two disproportionate assets (DA) cases against DMK leader and…

9 hours ago